Demographics details for Davenport, WA vs Klamath falls, OR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Davenport, WA vs Klamath falls, OR.

Data Davenport Klamath falls
Population 1,778 21,977
Median Age 36.2 years 35.1 years
Median Income $71,486 $46,695
Married Families 48.0% 31.0%
Poverty Level 10% 18%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 5.2

Population Comparison: Davenport vs Klamath falls

  • The population in Klamath falls is higher at 21,977, compared to 1,778 in Davenport.
  • Residents in Davenport have a higher median age of 36.2 years compared to 35.1 years in Klamath falls.
  • Davenport has a higher median income of $71,486 compared to $46,695 in Klamath falls.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Davenport at 48.0% compared to 31.0% in Klamath falls.
  • The poverty level is higher in Klamath falls at 18%, compared to 10% in Davenport.
  • Klamath falls has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.2% in Davenport.

Demographics

Demographics Davenport vs Klamath falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Davenport Klamath falls
Black 2 1
White 83 69
Asian 2 1
Hispanic 7 15
Two or More Races 6 11
American Indian Data is updating 3

Demographics Comparison: Davenport vs Klamath falls

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Davenport at 2% compared to 1% in Klamath falls.
  • Davenport has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 69% in Klamath falls.
  • The Asian population is larger in Davenport at 2% compared to 1% in Klamath falls.
  • Klamath falls has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 7% in Davenport.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Klamath falls at 11%, compared to 6% in Davenport.
  • In Klamath falls, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Davenport.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Davenport Klamath falls
Mental Health Not Good 17.6% 20.2%
Physical Health Not Good 11.5% 13.4%
Depression 27.3% 28.4%
Smoking 15.5% 19.9%
Binge Drinking 18.8% 15.8%
Obesity 31.8% 35.9%
Disability Percentage 18.0% 20.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Davenport vs Klamath falls

  • In Klamath falls, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 17.6% in Davenport.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Klamath falls at 28.4% versus 27.3% in Davenport.
  • Klamath falls has a higher smoking rate at 19.9% compared to 15.5% in Davenport.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Davenport at 18.8% compared to 15.8% in Klamath falls.
  • Klamath falls has higher obesity rates at 35.9% compared to 31.8% in Davenport.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Klamath falls at 20.0% compared to 18.0% in Davenport.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Davenport Klamath falls
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.9% (192)
High School Diploma 14.5% (258) 16.0% (3,508)
Less than High School 8.2% (145) 15.5% (3,401)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.4% (292) 14.4% (3,175)

Education Levels Comparison: Davenport vs Klamath falls

  • In Klamath falls, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Davenport.
  • In Klamath falls, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.0% compared to 14.5% in Davenport.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Klamath falls at 15.5%, compared to 8.2% in Davenport.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Davenport hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.4% compared to 14.4% in Klamath falls.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.