Demographics details for Davenport, IA vs Gouldsboro, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Davenport, IA vs Gouldsboro, PA.
Data | Davenport | Gouldsboro |
---|---|---|
Population | 100,486 | 720 |
Median Age | 37.4 years | 49.8 years |
Median Income | $59,890 | $50,938 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 48.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Davenport vs Gouldsboro
- In Davenport, the population is higher at 100,486, compared to 720 in Gouldsboro.
- The median age in Gouldsboro is higher at 49.8 years, compared to 37.4 years in Davenport.
- Davenport has a higher median income of $59,890 compared to $50,938 in Gouldsboro.
- In Gouldsboro, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 36.0% in Davenport.
- Davenport has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 5% in Gouldsboro.
- The unemployment rate in Davenport is higher at 4.3%, compared to 3.2% in Gouldsboro.
Demographics
Demographics Davenport vs Gouldsboro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Davenport | Gouldsboro |
---|---|---|
Black | 11 | 2 |
White | 70 | 93 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 9 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Davenport vs Gouldsboro
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Davenport at 11% compared to 2% in Gouldsboro.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Gouldsboro at 93% compared to 70% in Davenport.
- The Asian population is larger in Davenport at 2% compared to 0% in Gouldsboro.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Davenport at 9% compared to 3% in Gouldsboro.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Davenport at 8% compared to 2% in Gouldsboro.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Davenport and Gouldsboro at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Davenport | Gouldsboro |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | 16.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 11.3% |
Depression | 18.6% | 22.7% |
Smoking | 19.9% | 18.7% |
Binge Drinking | 20.0% | 19.2% |
Obesity | 39.6% | 32.8% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Davenport vs Gouldsboro
- In Gouldsboro, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 16.2% in Davenport.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gouldsboro at 22.7% versus 18.6% in Davenport.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Davenport at 19.9% compared to 18.7% in Gouldsboro.
- Binge drinking is more common in Davenport at 20.0% compared to 19.2% in Gouldsboro.
- Obesity rates are higher in Davenport at 39.6% compared to 32.8% in Gouldsboro.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Gouldsboro at 21.0% compared to 13.0% in Davenport.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Davenport | Gouldsboro |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (602) | 1.4% (10) |
High School Diploma | 16.5% (16,537) | 23.2% (167) |
Less than High School | 9.5% (9,588) | 6.4% (46) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.7% (19,748) | 20.8% (150) |
Education Levels Comparison: Davenport vs Gouldsboro
- In Gouldsboro, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.6% in Davenport.
- In Gouldsboro, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.2% compared to 16.5% in Davenport.
- More residents in Davenport have less than a high school education at 9.5% compared to 6.4% in Gouldsboro.
- In Gouldsboro, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.8% compared to 19.7% in Davenport.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.