Demographics details for Darwin, MN vs Waterman, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Darwin, MN vs Waterman, IL.
| Data | Darwin | Waterman |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 344 | 1,427 |
| Median Age | 34.8 years | 36.2 years |
| Median Income | $62,083 | $87,292 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Darwin vs Waterman
- The population in Waterman is higher at 1,427, compared to 344 in Darwin.
- The median age in Waterman is higher at 36.2 years, compared to 34.8 years in Darwin.
- Waterman has a higher median income of $87,292, compared to $62,083 in Darwin.
- In Waterman, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 37.0% in Darwin.
- The poverty level is higher in Waterman at 6%, compared to 5% in Darwin.
- Waterman has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 3.2% in Darwin.
Demographics
Demographics Darwin vs Waterman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Darwin | Waterman |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 90 | 78 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Darwin vs Waterman
- In Waterman, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Darwin.
- Darwin has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 78% in Waterman.
- In Waterman, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Darwin.
- Waterman has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 9% in Darwin.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Waterman at 9%, compared to 1% in Darwin.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Darwin and Waterman at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Darwin | Waterman |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.7% | 16.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.8% | 10.4% |
| Depression | 23.2% | 21.6% |
| Smoking | 17.5% | 16.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 22.3% | 18.7% |
| Obesity | 32.7% | 36.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Darwin vs Waterman
- In Waterman, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.0% compared to 14.7% in Darwin.
- Depression is more prevalent in Darwin at 23.2% compared to 21.6% in Waterman.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Darwin at 17.5% compared to 16.2% in Waterman.
- Binge drinking is more common in Darwin at 22.3% compared to 18.7% in Waterman.
- Waterman has higher obesity rates at 36.4% compared to 32.7% in Darwin.
- Disability percentages are higher in Darwin at 19.0% compared to 10.0% in Waterman.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Darwin | Waterman |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (6) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 20.9% (72) | 22.6% (323) |
| Less than High School | 9.3% (32) | 8.5% (122) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.9% (41) | 15.5% (221) |
Education Levels Comparison: Darwin vs Waterman
- A higher percentage of residents in Darwin have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.0% in Waterman.
- In Waterman, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.6% compared to 20.9% in Darwin.
- More residents in Darwin have less than a high school education at 9.3% compared to 8.5% in Waterman.
- In Waterman, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.5% compared to 11.9% in Darwin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.