Demographics details for Darwin, MN vs Bowman, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Darwin, MN vs Bowman, SC.
Data | Darwin | Bowman |
---|---|---|
Population | 344 | 769 |
Median Age | 34.8 years | 47.2 years |
Median Income | $62,083 | $33,250 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 21.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Darwin vs Bowman
- The population in Bowman is higher at 769, compared to 344 in Darwin.
- The median age in Bowman is higher at 47.2 years, compared to 34.8 years in Darwin.
- Darwin has a higher median income of $62,083 compared to $33,250 in Bowman.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Darwin at 37.0% compared to 21.0% in Bowman.
- The poverty level is higher in Bowman at 15%, compared to 5% in Darwin.
- Bowman has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.2% in Darwin.
Demographics
Demographics Darwin vs Bowman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Darwin | Bowman |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 66 |
White | 90 | 33 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 9 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 1 | 1 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Darwin vs Bowman
- In Bowman, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 66% compared to 0% in Darwin.
- Darwin has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 33% in Bowman.
- Both Darwin and Bowman have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Darwin at 9% compared to 0% in Bowman.
- Both Darwin and Bowman have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 1%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Darwin and Bowman at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Darwin | Bowman |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.7% | 18.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.8% | 13.9% |
Depression | 23.2% | 19.3% |
Smoking | 17.5% | 21.8% |
Binge Drinking | 22.3% | 14.3% |
Obesity | 32.7% | 43.7% |
Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Darwin vs Bowman
- In Bowman, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 14.7% in Darwin.
- Depression is more prevalent in Darwin at 23.2% compared to 19.3% in Bowman.
- Bowman has a higher smoking rate at 21.8% compared to 17.5% in Darwin.
- Binge drinking is more common in Darwin at 22.3% compared to 14.3% in Bowman.
- Bowman has higher obesity rates at 43.7% compared to 32.7% in Darwin.
- Disability percentages are higher in Darwin at 19.0% compared to 17.0% in Bowman.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Darwin | Bowman |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.7% (6) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 20.9% (72) | 26.4% (203) |
Less than High School | 9.3% (32) | 12.6% (97) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.9% (41) | 7.3% (56) |
Education Levels Comparison: Darwin vs Bowman
- A higher percentage of residents in Darwin have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.0% in Bowman.
- In Bowman, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.4% compared to 20.9% in Darwin.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bowman at 12.6%, compared to 9.3% in Darwin.
- A higher percentage of residents in Darwin hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.9% compared to 7.3% in Bowman.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.