Demographics details for Dardanelle, AR vs Provo, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Dardanelle, AR vs Provo, UT.
Data | Dardanelle | Provo |
---|---|---|
Population | 4,518 | 113,523 |
Median Age | 37.9 years | 23.6 years |
Median Income | $47,724 | $57,943 |
Married Families | 41.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 19% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.7 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Dardanelle vs Provo
- The population in Provo is higher at 113,523, compared to 4,518 in Dardanelle.
- Residents in Dardanelle have a higher median age of 37.9 years compared to 23.6 years in Provo.
- Provo has a higher median income of $57,943, compared to $47,724 in Dardanelle.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Dardanelle at 41.0% compared to 36.0% in Provo.
- Dardanelle has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 11% in Provo.
- The unemployment rate in Dardanelle is higher at 5.7%, compared to 4.0% in Provo.
Demographics
Demographics Dardanelle vs Provo provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Dardanelle | Provo |
---|---|---|
Black | 8 | 1 |
White | 50 | 69 |
Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
Hispanic | 40 | 18 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Dardanelle vs Provo
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Dardanelle at 8% compared to 1% in Provo.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Provo at 69% compared to 50% in Dardanelle.
- In Provo, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Dardanelle.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Dardanelle at 40% compared to 18% in Provo.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Provo at 9%, compared to 2% in Dardanelle.
- In Provo, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Dardanelle.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Dardanelle | Provo |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 16.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.9% | 12.0% |
Depression | 26.3% | 24.5% |
Smoking | 22.1% | 8.4% |
Binge Drinking | 14.0% | 7.3% |
Obesity | 37.5% | 33.5% |
Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Dardanelle vs Provo
- More residents in Dardanelle report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 16.3% in Provo.
- Depression is more prevalent in Dardanelle at 26.3% compared to 24.5% in Provo.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Dardanelle at 22.1% compared to 8.4% in Provo.
- Binge drinking is more common in Dardanelle at 14.0% compared to 7.3% in Provo.
- Obesity rates are higher in Dardanelle at 37.5% compared to 33.5% in Provo.
- Disability percentages are higher in Dardanelle at 21.0% compared to 10.0% in Provo.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Dardanelle | Provo |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.1% (94) | 0.6% (663) |
High School Diploma | 16.5% (745) | 4.6% (5,209) |
Less than High School | 36.0% (1,626) | 5.7% (6,435) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.7% (346) | 18.3% (20,752) |
Education Levels Comparison: Dardanelle vs Provo
- A higher percentage of residents in Dardanelle have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.6% in Provo.
- A higher percentage of residents in Dardanelle hold a high school diploma at 16.5% compared to 4.6% in Provo.
- More residents in Dardanelle have less than a high school education at 36.0% compared to 5.7% in Provo.
- In Provo, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.3% compared to 7.7% in Dardanelle.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.