Demographics details for Dardanelle, AR vs Litchfield park, AZ

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Dardanelle, AR vs Litchfield park, AZ.

Data Dardanelle Litchfield park
Population 4,518 6,960
Median Age 37.9 years 47.7 years
Median Income $47,724 $117,601
Married Families 41.0% 52.0%
Poverty Level 19% 5%
Unemployment Rate 5.7 5.1

Population Comparison: Dardanelle vs Litchfield park

  • The population in Litchfield park is higher at 6,960, compared to 4,518 in Dardanelle.
  • The median age in Litchfield park is higher at 47.7 years, compared to 37.9 years in Dardanelle.
  • Litchfield park has a higher median income of $117,601, compared to $47,724 in Dardanelle.
  • In Litchfield park, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 41.0% in Dardanelle.
  • Dardanelle has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 5% in Litchfield park.
  • The unemployment rate in Dardanelle is higher at 5.7%, compared to 5.1% in Litchfield park.

Demographics

Demographics Dardanelle vs Litchfield park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Dardanelle Litchfield park
Black 8 2
White 50 57
Asian Data is updating 6
Hispanic 40 23
Two or More Races 2 12
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Dardanelle vs Litchfield park

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Dardanelle at 8% compared to 2% in Litchfield park.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Litchfield park at 57% compared to 50% in Dardanelle.
  • In Litchfield park, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 0% in Dardanelle.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Dardanelle at 40% compared to 23% in Litchfield park.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Litchfield park at 12%, compared to 2% in Dardanelle.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Dardanelle and Litchfield park at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Dardanelle Litchfield park
Mental Health Not Good 19.2% 15.0%
Physical Health Not Good 14.9% 8.3%
Depression 26.3% 18.9%
Smoking 22.1% 10.7%
Binge Drinking 14.0% 18.9%
Obesity 37.5% 27.2%
Disability Percentage 21.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Dardanelle vs Litchfield park

  • More residents in Dardanelle report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 15.0% in Litchfield park.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Dardanelle at 26.3% compared to 18.9% in Litchfield park.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Dardanelle at 22.1% compared to 10.7% in Litchfield park.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Litchfield park at 18.9% compared to 14.0% in Dardanelle.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Dardanelle at 37.5% compared to 27.2% in Litchfield park.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Dardanelle at 21.0% compared to 13.0% in Litchfield park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Dardanelle Litchfield park
No Schooling 2.1% (94) 0.2% (16)
High School Diploma 16.5% (745) 11.2% (777)
Less than High School 36.0% (1,626) 2.2% (150)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 7.7% (346) 36.0% (2,504)

Education Levels Comparison: Dardanelle vs Litchfield park

  • A higher percentage of residents in Dardanelle have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.2% in Litchfield park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Dardanelle hold a high school diploma at 16.5% compared to 11.2% in Litchfield park.
  • More residents in Dardanelle have less than a high school education at 36.0% compared to 2.2% in Litchfield park.
  • In Litchfield park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.0% compared to 7.7% in Dardanelle.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.