Demographics details for Danville, KY vs Onalaska, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Danville, KY vs Onalaska, TX.
| Data | Danville | Onalaska |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 17,303 | 3,205 |
| Median Age | 36.4 years | 45.2 years |
| Median Income | $48,038 | $56,168 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Danville vs Onalaska
- In Danville, the population is higher at 17,303, compared to 3,205 in Onalaska.
- The median age in Onalaska is higher at 45.2 years, compared to 36.4 years in Danville.
- Onalaska has a higher median income of $56,168, compared to $48,038 in Danville.
- In Onalaska, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 31.0% in Danville.
- Danville has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 12% in Onalaska.
- Onalaska has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.1% in Danville.
Demographics
Demographics Danville vs Onalaska provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Danville | Onalaska |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 12 | 1 |
| White | 79 | 91 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 4 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Danville vs Onalaska
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Danville at 12% compared to 1% in Onalaska.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Onalaska at 91% compared to 79% in Danville.
- The Asian population is larger in Danville at 1% compared to 0% in Onalaska.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Danville at 4% compared to 3% in Onalaska.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Onalaska at 5%, compared to 4% in Danville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Danville and Onalaska at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Danville | Onalaska |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.1% | 12.5% |
| Depression | 27.7% | 26.0% |
| Smoking | 21.6% | 20.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 19.4% |
| Obesity | 41.5% | 39.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Danville vs Onalaska
- More residents in Danville report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 19.0% in Onalaska.
- Depression is more prevalent in Danville at 27.7% compared to 26.0% in Onalaska.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Danville at 21.6% compared to 20.4% in Onalaska.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Onalaska at 19.4% compared to 14.7% in Danville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Danville at 41.5% compared to 39.9% in Onalaska.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Onalaska at 24.0% compared to 15.0% in Danville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Danville | Onalaska |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (108) | 0.7% (21) |
| High School Diploma | 16.8% (2,899) | 15.3% (491) |
| Less than High School | 12.1% (2,102) | 21.5% (689) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.1% (2,789) | 5.0% (161) |
Education Levels Comparison: Danville vs Onalaska
- In Onalaska, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.6% in Danville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Danville hold a high school diploma at 16.8% compared to 15.3% in Onalaska.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Onalaska at 21.5%, compared to 12.1% in Danville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Danville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.1% compared to 5.0% in Onalaska.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.