Demographics details for Danville, KY vs Glen rock, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Danville, KY vs Glen rock, NJ.
| Data | Danville | Glen rock |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 17,303 | 12,039 |
| Median Age | 36.4 years | 39.3 years |
| Median Income | $48,038 | $202,586 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 49.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Danville vs Glen rock
- In Danville, the population is higher at 17,303, compared to 12,039 in Glen rock.
- The median age in Glen rock is higher at 39.3 years, compared to 36.4 years in Danville.
- Glen rock has a higher median income of $202,586, compared to $48,038 in Danville.
- In Glen rock, the percentage of married families is higher at 49.0%, compared to 31.0% in Danville.
- Danville has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 0% in Glen rock.
- The unemployment rate in Danville is higher at 4.1%, compared to 3.2% in Glen rock.
Demographics
Demographics Danville vs Glen rock provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Danville | Glen rock |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 12 | 1 |
| White | 79 | 75 |
| Asian | 1 | 15 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Danville vs Glen rock
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Danville at 12% compared to 1% in Glen rock.
- Danville has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 75% in Glen rock.
- In Glen rock, the Asian population stands at 15%, greater than 1% in Danville.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Danville and Glen rock at 4%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Glen rock at 5%, compared to 4% in Danville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Danville and Glen rock at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Danville | Glen rock |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 11.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.1% | 6.5% |
| Depression | 27.7% | 16.8% |
| Smoking | 21.6% | 8.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 18.8% |
| Obesity | 41.5% | 22.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Danville vs Glen rock
- More residents in Danville report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 11.9% in Glen rock.
- Depression is more prevalent in Danville at 27.7% compared to 16.8% in Glen rock.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Danville at 21.6% compared to 8.2% in Glen rock.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Glen rock at 18.8% compared to 14.7% in Danville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Danville at 41.5% compared to 22.8% in Glen rock.
- Disability percentages are higher in Danville at 15.0% compared to 5.0% in Glen rock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Danville | Glen rock |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (108) | 0.9% (106) |
| High School Diploma | 16.8% (2,899) | 4.7% (566) |
| Less than High School | 12.1% (2,102) | 2.7% (323) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.1% (2,789) | 44.0% (5,303) |
Education Levels Comparison: Danville vs Glen rock
- In Glen rock, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.6% in Danville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Danville hold a high school diploma at 16.8% compared to 4.7% in Glen rock.
- More residents in Danville have less than a high school education at 12.1% compared to 2.7% in Glen rock.
- In Glen rock, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 44.0% compared to 16.1% in Danville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.