Demographics details for Danville, IL vs Young harris, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Danville, IL vs Young harris, GA.
Data | Danville | Young harris |
---|---|---|
Population | 28,472 | 810 |
Median Age | 38.6 years | 20.4 years |
Median Income | $42,424 | $27,500 |
Married Families | 25.0% | 19.0% |
Poverty Level | 20% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 8.6 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Danville vs Young harris
- In Danville, the population is higher at 28,472, compared to 810 in Young harris.
- Residents in Danville have a higher median age of 38.6 years compared to 20.4 years in Young harris.
- Danville has a higher median income of $42,424 compared to $27,500 in Young harris.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Danville at 25.0% compared to 19.0% in Young harris.
- Danville has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 0% in Young harris.
- The unemployment rate in Danville is higher at 8.6%, compared to 3.5% in Young harris.
Demographics
Demographics Danville vs Young harris provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Danville | Young harris |
---|---|---|
Black | 34 | 14 |
White | 52 | 70 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 8 | 11 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Danville vs Young harris
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Danville at 34% compared to 14% in Young harris.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Young harris at 70% compared to 52% in Danville.
- The Asian population is larger in Danville at 1% compared to 0% in Young harris.
- Young harris has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 11%, compared to 8% in Danville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Danville at 5% compared to 3% in Young harris.
- In Young harris, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Danville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Danville | Young harris |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.9% | 17.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.5% | 12.0% |
Depression | 21.2% | 23.4% |
Smoking | 23.9% | 17.3% |
Binge Drinking | 14.9% | 16.9% |
Obesity | 41.4% | 33.5% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Danville vs Young harris
- More residents in Danville report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 17.3% in Young harris.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Young harris at 23.4% versus 21.2% in Danville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Danville at 23.9% compared to 17.3% in Young harris.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Young harris at 16.9% compared to 14.9% in Danville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Danville at 41.4% compared to 33.5% in Young harris.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Young harris at 23.0% compared to 17.0% in Danville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Danville | Young harris |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (270) | 0.2% (2) |
High School Diploma | 20.6% (5,853) | 5.7% (46) |
Less than High School | 13.1% (3,727) | 4.4% (36) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.7% (3,344) | 9.3% (75) |
Education Levels Comparison: Danville vs Young harris
- A higher percentage of residents in Danville have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.2% in Young harris.
- A higher percentage of residents in Danville hold a high school diploma at 20.6% compared to 5.7% in Young harris.
- More residents in Danville have less than a high school education at 13.1% compared to 4.4% in Young harris.
- A higher percentage of residents in Danville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.7% compared to 9.3% in Young harris.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.