Demographics details for Danville, IL vs Summerfield, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Danville, IL vs Summerfield, NC.
| Data | Danville | Summerfield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 28,472 | 11,111 |
| Median Age | 38.6 years | 45.1 years |
| Median Income | $42,424 | $148,182 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 52.0% |
| Poverty Level | 20% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 8.6 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Danville vs Summerfield
- In Danville, the population is higher at 28,472, compared to 11,111 in Summerfield.
- The median age in Summerfield is higher at 45.1 years, compared to 38.6 years in Danville.
- Summerfield has a higher median income of $148,182, compared to $42,424 in Danville.
- In Summerfield, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 25.0% in Danville.
- Danville has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 7% in Summerfield.
- The unemployment rate in Danville is higher at 8.6%, compared to 3.4% in Summerfield.
Demographics
Demographics Danville vs Summerfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Danville | Summerfield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 34 | 5 |
| White | 52 | 82 |
| Asian | 1 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Danville vs Summerfield
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Danville at 34% compared to 5% in Summerfield.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Summerfield at 82% compared to 52% in Danville.
- In Summerfield, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Danville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Danville at 8% compared to 5% in Summerfield.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Danville at 5% compared to 4% in Summerfield.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Danville and Summerfield at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Danville | Summerfield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.9% | 13.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.5% | 8.2% |
| Depression | 21.2% | 22.6% |
| Smoking | 23.9% | 10.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.9% | 19.5% |
| Obesity | 41.4% | 28.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Danville vs Summerfield
- More residents in Danville report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 13.0% in Summerfield.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Summerfield at 22.6% versus 21.2% in Danville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Danville at 23.9% compared to 10.6% in Summerfield.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Summerfield at 19.5% compared to 14.9% in Danville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Danville at 41.4% compared to 28.7% in Summerfield.
- Disability percentages are higher in Danville at 17.0% compared to 12.0% in Summerfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Danville | Summerfield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (270) | 1.0% (109) |
| High School Diploma | 20.6% (5,853) | 8.8% (973) |
| Less than High School | 13.1% (3,727) | 6.1% (674) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.7% (3,344) | 38.9% (4,326) |
Education Levels Comparison: Danville vs Summerfield
- In Summerfield, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.9% in Danville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Danville hold a high school diploma at 20.6% compared to 8.8% in Summerfield.
- More residents in Danville have less than a high school education at 13.1% compared to 6.1% in Summerfield.
- In Summerfield, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 11.7% in Danville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.