Demographics details for Dallas, PA vs Coalinga, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Dallas, PA vs Coalinga, CA.
| Data | Dallas | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,689 | 17,024 |
| Median Age | 38.9 years | 35.0 years |
| Median Income | $83,350 | $68,976 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.6 | 6.5 |
Population Comparison: Dallas vs Coalinga
- The population in Coalinga is higher at 17,024, compared to 2,689 in Dallas.
- Residents in Dallas have a higher median age of 38.9 years compared to 35.0 years in Coalinga.
- Dallas has a higher median income of $83,350 compared to $68,976 in Coalinga.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Dallas at 41.0% compared to 31.0% in Coalinga.
- The poverty level is higher in Coalinga at 15%, compared to 6% in Dallas.
- Coalinga has a higher unemployment rate at 6.5% compared to 5.6% in Dallas.
Demographics
Demographics Dallas vs Coalinga provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Dallas | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 4 |
| White | 90 | 9 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 65 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 18 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Dallas vs Coalinga
- In Coalinga, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 3% in Dallas.
- Dallas has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 9% in Coalinga.
- Both Dallas and Coalinga have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Coalinga has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 65%, compared to 2% in Dallas.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Coalinga at 18%, compared to 3% in Dallas.
- In Coalinga, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Dallas.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Dallas | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.0% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 21.1% | 16.4% |
| Smoking | 13.8% | 17.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.1% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 32.2% | 39.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Dallas vs Coalinga
- In Coalinga, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 15.0% in Dallas.
- Depression is more prevalent in Dallas at 21.1% compared to 16.4% in Coalinga.
- Coalinga has a higher smoking rate at 17.2% compared to 13.8% in Dallas.
- Binge drinking is more common in Dallas at 19.1% compared to 15.9% in Coalinga.
- Coalinga has higher obesity rates at 39.1% compared to 32.2% in Dallas.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Coalinga at 13.0% compared to 8.0% in Dallas.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Dallas | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (9) | 3.2% (537) |
| High School Diploma | 16.1% (433) | 13.8% (2,349) |
| Less than High School | 1.8% (48) | 39.2% (6,672) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 32.5% (874) | 8.1% (1,380) |
Education Levels Comparison: Dallas vs Coalinga
- In Coalinga, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 0.3% in Dallas.
- A higher percentage of residents in Dallas hold a high school diploma at 16.1% compared to 13.8% in Coalinga.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Coalinga at 39.2%, compared to 1.8% in Dallas.
- A higher percentage of residents in Dallas hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.5% compared to 8.1% in Coalinga.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.