Demographics details for Dalhart, TX vs Middle point, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Dalhart, TX vs Middle point, OH.
Data | Dalhart | Middle point |
---|---|---|
Population | 8,402 | 565 |
Median Age | 34.7 years | 37.0 years |
Median Income | $75,000 | $54,479 |
Married Families | 46.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Dalhart vs Middle point
- In Dalhart, the population is higher at 8,402, compared to 565 in Middle point.
- The median age in Middle point is higher at 37.0 years, compared to 34.7 years in Dalhart.
- Dalhart has a higher median income of $75,000 compared to $54,479 in Middle point.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Dalhart at 46.0% compared to 44.0% in Middle point.
- Dalhart has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 8% in Middle point.
- Middle point has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Dalhart.
Demographics
Demographics Dalhart vs Middle point provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Dalhart | Middle point |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
White | 37 | 99 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 46 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 15 | 1 |
American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Dalhart vs Middle point
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Dalhart and Middle point at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Middle point at 99% compared to 37% in Dalhart.
- Both Dalhart and Middle point have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Dalhart at 46% compared to 0% in Middle point.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Dalhart at 15% compared to 1% in Middle point.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Dalhart at 2% compared to 0% in Middle point.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Dalhart | Middle point |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.5% | 16.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 10.5% |
Depression | 23.5% | 23.4% |
Smoking | 17.8% | 18.5% |
Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 19.3% |
Obesity | 36.1% | 41.8% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Dalhart vs Middle point
- More residents in Dalhart report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 16.7% in Middle point.
- Depression is more prevalent in Dalhart at 23.5% compared to 23.4% in Middle point.
- Middle point has a higher smoking rate at 18.5% compared to 17.8% in Dalhart.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Middle point at 19.3% compared to 18.9% in Dalhart.
- Middle point has higher obesity rates at 41.8% compared to 36.1% in Dalhart.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Middle point at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Dalhart.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Dalhart | Middle point |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 4.1% (348) | 1.1% (6) |
High School Diploma | 20.8% (1,750) | 34.2% (193) |
Less than High School | 19.2% (1,609) | 13.1% (74) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.0% (1,095) | 9.4% (53) |
Education Levels Comparison: Dalhart vs Middle point
- A higher percentage of residents in Dalhart have no formal schooling at 4.1% compared to 1.1% in Middle point.
- In Middle point, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 34.2% compared to 20.8% in Dalhart.
- More residents in Dalhart have less than a high school education at 19.2% compared to 13.1% in Middle point.
- A higher percentage of residents in Dalhart hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.0% compared to 9.4% in Middle point.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.