Demographics details for Dadeville, AL vs Lexington, NC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Dadeville, AL vs Lexington, NC.

Data Dadeville Lexington
Population 3,001 19,679
Median Age 42.8 years 38.6 years
Median Income $46,477 $36,868
Married Families 36.0% 31.0%
Poverty Level 14% 15%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 5.2

Population Comparison: Dadeville vs Lexington

  • The population in Lexington is higher at 19,679, compared to 3,001 in Dadeville.
  • Residents in Dadeville have a higher median age of 42.8 years compared to 38.6 years in Lexington.
  • Dadeville has a higher median income of $46,477 compared to $36,868 in Lexington.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Dadeville at 36.0% compared to 31.0% in Lexington.
  • The poverty level is higher in Lexington at 15%, compared to 14% in Dadeville.
  • Lexington has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.5% in Dadeville.

Demographics

Demographics Dadeville vs Lexington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Dadeville Lexington
Black 35 31
White 64 38
Asian Data is updating 4
Hispanic Data is updating 16
Two or More Races 1 11
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Dadeville vs Lexington

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Dadeville at 35% compared to 31% in Lexington.
  • Dadeville has a higher percentage of White residents at 64% compared to 38% in Lexington.
  • In Lexington, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Dadeville.
  • Lexington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 0% in Dadeville.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lexington at 11%, compared to 1% in Dadeville.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Dadeville and Lexington at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Dadeville Lexington
Mental Health Not Good 21.6% 19.2%
Physical Health Not Good 16.7% 15.5%
Depression 23.9% 25.0%
Smoking 26.5% 24.1%
Binge Drinking 12.7% 13.8%
Obesity 46.8% 42.7%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 18.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Dadeville vs Lexington

  • More residents in Dadeville report poor mental health at 21.6% compared to 19.2% in Lexington.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Lexington at 25.0% versus 23.9% in Dadeville.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Dadeville at 26.5% compared to 24.1% in Lexington.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Lexington at 13.8% compared to 12.7% in Dadeville.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Dadeville at 46.8% compared to 42.7% in Lexington.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lexington at 18.0% compared to 16.0% in Dadeville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Dadeville Lexington
No Schooling 1.1% (32) 2.7% (531)
High School Diploma 21.6% (647) 17.0% (3,355)
Less than High School 31.9% (956) 25.6% (5,036)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.3% (279) 10.2% (2,009)

Education Levels Comparison: Dadeville vs Lexington

  • In Lexington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 1.1% in Dadeville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Dadeville hold a high school diploma at 21.6% compared to 17.0% in Lexington.
  • More residents in Dadeville have less than a high school education at 31.9% compared to 25.6% in Lexington.
  • In Lexington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.2% compared to 9.3% in Dadeville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.