Demographics details for Dade city, FL vs Pittsburg, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Dade city, FL vs Pittsburg, CA.
Data | Dade city | Pittsburg |
---|---|---|
Population | 7,670 | 77,572 |
Median Age | 40.4 years | 35.2 years |
Median Income | $63,493 | $98,408 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 37.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 5.3 |
Population Comparison: Dade city vs Pittsburg
- The population in Pittsburg is higher at 77,572, compared to 7,670 in Dade city.
- Residents in Dade city have a higher median age of 40.4 years compared to 35.2 years in Pittsburg.
- Pittsburg has a higher median income of $98,408, compared to $63,493 in Dade city.
- In Pittsburg, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 33.0% in Dade city.
- Dade city has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 0% in Pittsburg.
- Pittsburg has a higher unemployment rate at 5.3% compared to 4.6% in Dade city.
Demographics
Demographics Dade city vs Pittsburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Dade city | Pittsburg |
---|---|---|
Black | 18 | 15 |
White | 59 | 9 |
Asian | Data is updating | 18 |
Hispanic | 19 | 43 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 14 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Dade city vs Pittsburg
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Dade city at 18% compared to 15% in Pittsburg.
- Dade city has a higher percentage of White residents at 59% compared to 9% in Pittsburg.
- In Pittsburg, the Asian population stands at 18%, greater than 0% in Dade city.
- Pittsburg has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 43%, compared to 19% in Dade city.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pittsburg at 14%, compared to 4% in Dade city.
- In Pittsburg, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Dade city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Dade city | Pittsburg |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 15.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.2% | 11.8% |
Depression | 24.2% | 16.7% |
Smoking | 28.5% | 12.7% |
Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 15.0% |
Obesity | 36.8% | 28.4% |
Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Dade city vs Pittsburg
- More residents in Dade city report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 15.8% in Pittsburg.
- Depression is more prevalent in Dade city at 24.2% compared to 16.7% in Pittsburg.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Dade city at 28.5% compared to 12.7% in Pittsburg.
- Binge drinking rates are similar in both Dade city and Pittsburg at 15.0%.
- Obesity rates are higher in Dade city at 36.8% compared to 28.4% in Pittsburg.
- Disability percentages are higher in Dade city at 21.0% compared to 13.0% in Pittsburg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Dade city | Pittsburg |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.3% (101) | 3.1% (2,439) |
High School Diploma | 22.7% (1,743) | 14.5% (11,263) |
Less than High School | 19.3% (1,481) | 23.3% (18,048) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.7% (1,203) | 14.8% (11,476) |
Education Levels Comparison: Dade city vs Pittsburg
- In Pittsburg, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 1.3% in Dade city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Dade city hold a high school diploma at 22.7% compared to 14.5% in Pittsburg.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pittsburg at 23.3%, compared to 19.3% in Dade city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Dade city hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.7% compared to 14.8% in Pittsburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.