Demographics details for Dacula, GA vs La mirada, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Dacula, GA vs La mirada, CA.
| Data | Dacula | La mirada |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,460 | 46,323 |
| Median Age | 35.0 years | 41.7 years |
| Median Income | $81,322 | $104,130 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 5.4 |
Population Comparison: Dacula vs La mirada
- The population in La mirada is higher at 46,323, compared to 7,460 in Dacula.
- The median age in La mirada is higher at 41.7 years, compared to 35.0 years in Dacula.
- La mirada has a higher median income of $104,130, compared to $81,322 in Dacula.
- In La mirada, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 39.0% in Dacula.
- The poverty level is higher in La mirada at 9%, compared to 5% in Dacula.
- La mirada has a higher unemployment rate at 5.4% compared to 3.2% in Dacula.
Demographics
Demographics Dacula vs La mirada provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Dacula | La mirada |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 23 | 2 |
| White | 41 | 13 |
| Asian | 7 | 23 |
| Hispanic | 19 | 47 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 14 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Dacula vs La mirada
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Dacula at 23% compared to 2% in La mirada.
- Dacula has a higher percentage of White residents at 41% compared to 13% in La mirada.
- In La mirada, the Asian population stands at 23%, greater than 7% in Dacula.
- La mirada has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 47%, compared to 19% in Dacula.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in La mirada at 14%, compared to 9% in Dacula.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Dacula and La mirada at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Dacula | La mirada |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | 14.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.5% | 9.3% |
| Depression | 19.1% | 15.2% |
| Smoking | 12.9% | 8.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 16.1% |
| Obesity | 29.7% | 25.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Dacula vs La mirada
- More residents in Dacula report poor mental health at 14.4% compared to 14.0% in La mirada.
- Depression is more prevalent in Dacula at 19.1% compared to 15.2% in La mirada.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Dacula at 12.9% compared to 8.9% in La mirada.
- Binge drinking is more common in Dacula at 16.5% compared to 16.1% in La mirada.
- Obesity rates are higher in Dacula at 29.7% compared to 25.3% in La mirada.
- Disability percentages are higher in Dacula at 16.0% compared to 9.0% in La mirada.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Dacula | La mirada |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 4.8% (355) | 1.6% (720) |
| High School Diploma | 8.0% (599) | 13.7% (6,340) |
| Less than High School | 17.0% (1,267) | 12.5% (5,777) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.2% (988) | 27.4% (12,682) |
Education Levels Comparison: Dacula vs La mirada
- A higher percentage of residents in Dacula have no formal schooling at 4.8% compared to 1.6% in La mirada.
- In La mirada, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.7% compared to 8.0% in Dacula.
- More residents in Dacula have less than a high school education at 17.0% compared to 12.5% in La mirada.
- In La mirada, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.4% compared to 13.2% in Dacula.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.