Demographics details for Cuyahoga falls, OH vs Woodville, MS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Cuyahoga falls, OH vs Woodville, MS.

Data Cuyahoga falls Woodville
Population 50,655 869
Median Age 37.8 years 49.5 years
Median Income $67,922 $44,844
Married Families 41.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 7% 23%
Unemployment Rate 4.8 5.1

Population Comparison: Cuyahoga falls vs Woodville

  • In Cuyahoga falls, the population is higher at 50,655, compared to 869 in Woodville.
  • The median age in Woodville is higher at 49.5 years, compared to 37.8 years in Cuyahoga falls.
  • Cuyahoga falls has a higher median income of $67,922 compared to $44,844 in Woodville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Cuyahoga falls at 41.0% compared to 38.0% in Woodville.
  • The poverty level is higher in Woodville at 23%, compared to 7% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • Woodville has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 4.8% in Cuyahoga falls.

Demographics

Demographics Cuyahoga falls vs Woodville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Cuyahoga falls Woodville
Black 5 93
White 81 -2
Asian 6 Data is updating
Hispanic 3 5
Two or More Races 5 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Cuyahoga falls vs Woodville

  • In Woodville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 93% compared to 5% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • Cuyahoga falls has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to -2% in Woodville.
  • The Asian population is larger in Cuyahoga falls at 6% compared to 0% in Woodville.
  • Woodville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 3% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Cuyahoga falls at 5% compared to 4% in Woodville.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cuyahoga falls and Woodville at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Cuyahoga falls Woodville
Mental Health Not Good 17.1% 19.3%
Physical Health Not Good 11.1% 16.1%
Depression 25.1% 21.1%
Smoking 18.5% 26.4%
Binge Drinking 18.8% 11.0%
Obesity 41.1% 46.0%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 33.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Cuyahoga falls vs Woodville

  • In Woodville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 17.1% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Cuyahoga falls at 25.1% compared to 21.1% in Woodville.
  • Woodville has a higher smoking rate at 26.4% compared to 18.5% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Cuyahoga falls at 18.8% compared to 11.0% in Woodville.
  • Woodville has higher obesity rates at 46.0% compared to 41.1% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Woodville at 33.0% compared to 13.0% in Cuyahoga falls.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Cuyahoga falls Woodville
No Schooling 1.6% (825) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 19.4% (9,813) 36.8% (320)
Less than High School 6.3% (3,197) 10.5% (91)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 26.1% (13,215) 15.1% (131)

Education Levels Comparison: Cuyahoga falls vs Woodville

  • A higher percentage of residents in Cuyahoga falls have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.0% in Woodville.
  • In Woodville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 36.8% compared to 19.4% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Woodville at 10.5%, compared to 6.3% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Cuyahoga falls hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.1% compared to 15.1% in Woodville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.