Demographics details for Cuyahoga falls, OH vs Stillwater, MN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Cuyahoga falls, OH vs Stillwater, MN.

Data Cuyahoga falls Stillwater
Population 50,655 19,276
Median Age 37.8 years 41.8 years
Median Income $67,922 $107,986
Married Families 41.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level 7% 5%
Unemployment Rate 4.8 3.5

Population Comparison: Cuyahoga falls vs Stillwater

  • In Cuyahoga falls, the population is higher at 50,655, compared to 19,276 in Stillwater.
  • The median age in Stillwater is higher at 41.8 years, compared to 37.8 years in Cuyahoga falls.
  • Stillwater has a higher median income of $107,986, compared to $67,922 in Cuyahoga falls.
  • In Stillwater, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 41.0% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • Cuyahoga falls has a higher poverty level at 7% compared to 5% in Stillwater.
  • The unemployment rate in Cuyahoga falls is higher at 4.8%, compared to 3.5% in Stillwater.

Demographics

Demographics Cuyahoga falls vs Stillwater provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Cuyahoga falls Stillwater
Black 5 3
White 81 83
Asian 6 2
Hispanic 3 7
Two or More Races 5 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Cuyahoga falls vs Stillwater

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cuyahoga falls at 5% compared to 3% in Stillwater.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Stillwater at 83% compared to 81% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • The Asian population is larger in Cuyahoga falls at 6% compared to 2% in Stillwater.
  • Stillwater has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 3% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • Both Cuyahoga falls and Stillwater have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 5%.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cuyahoga falls and Stillwater at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Cuyahoga falls Stillwater
Mental Health Not Good 17.1% 13.5%
Physical Health Not Good 11.1% 7.8%
Depression 25.1% 23.3%
Smoking 18.5% 13.0%
Binge Drinking 18.8% 21.5%
Obesity 41.1% 31.5%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Cuyahoga falls vs Stillwater

  • More residents in Cuyahoga falls report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 13.5% in Stillwater.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Cuyahoga falls at 25.1% compared to 23.3% in Stillwater.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Cuyahoga falls at 18.5% compared to 13.0% in Stillwater.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Stillwater at 21.5% compared to 18.8% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Cuyahoga falls at 41.1% compared to 31.5% in Stillwater.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Cuyahoga falls at 13.0% compared to 10.0% in Stillwater.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Cuyahoga falls Stillwater
No Schooling 1.6% (825) 1.0% (186)
High School Diploma 19.4% (9,813) 11.9% (2,297)
Less than High School 6.3% (3,197) 4.0% (778)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 26.1% (13,215) 34.4% (6,634)

Education Levels Comparison: Cuyahoga falls vs Stillwater

  • A higher percentage of residents in Cuyahoga falls have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 1.0% in Stillwater.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Cuyahoga falls hold a high school diploma at 19.4% compared to 11.9% in Stillwater.
  • More residents in Cuyahoga falls have less than a high school education at 6.3% compared to 4.0% in Stillwater.
  • In Stillwater, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.4% compared to 26.1% in Cuyahoga falls.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.