Demographics details for Cuyahoga falls, OH vs Kelso, TN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Cuyahoga falls, OH vs Kelso, TN.

Data Cuyahoga falls Kelso
Population 50,655 185
Median Age 37.8 years 42.0 years
Median Income $67,922 $60,000
Married Families 41.0% 70.0%
Poverty Level 7% 13%
Unemployment Rate 4.8 3.5

Population Comparison: Cuyahoga falls vs Kelso

  • In Cuyahoga falls, the population is higher at 50,655, compared to 185 in Kelso.
  • The median age in Kelso is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 37.8 years in Cuyahoga falls.
  • Cuyahoga falls has a higher median income of $67,922 compared to $60,000 in Kelso.
  • In Kelso, the percentage of married families is higher at 70.0%, compared to 41.0% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • The poverty level is higher in Kelso at 13%, compared to 7% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • The unemployment rate in Cuyahoga falls is higher at 4.8%, compared to 3.5% in Kelso.

Demographics

Demographics Cuyahoga falls vs Kelso provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Cuyahoga falls Kelso
Black 5 Data is updating
White 81 100
Asian 6 Data is updating
Hispanic 3 Data is updating
Two or More Races 5 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Cuyahoga falls vs Kelso

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cuyahoga falls at 5% compared to 0% in Kelso.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Kelso at 100% compared to 81% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • The Asian population is larger in Cuyahoga falls at 6% compared to 0% in Kelso.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Cuyahoga falls at 3% compared to 0% in Kelso.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Cuyahoga falls at 5% compared to 0% in Kelso.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cuyahoga falls and Kelso at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Cuyahoga falls Kelso
Mental Health Not Good 17.1% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 11.1% Data is updating%
Depression 25.1% Data is updating%
Smoking 18.5% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 18.8% Data is updating%
Obesity 41.1% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 13.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Cuyahoga falls vs Kelso

  • More residents in Cuyahoga falls report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Cuyahoga falls at 25.1% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Cuyahoga falls at 18.5% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Cuyahoga falls at 18.8% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Cuyahoga falls at 41.1% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Cuyahoga falls at 13.0% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Cuyahoga falls Kelso
No Schooling 1.6% (825) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 19.4% (9,813) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 6.3% (3,197) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 26.1% (13,215) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Cuyahoga falls vs Kelso

  • A higher percentage of residents in Cuyahoga falls have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Cuyahoga falls hold a high school diploma at 19.4% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
  • More residents in Cuyahoga falls have less than a high school education at 6.3% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Cuyahoga falls hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.1% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.