Demographics details for Cuyahoga falls, OH vs Cody, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cuyahoga falls, OH vs Cody, NE.
Data | Cuyahoga falls | Cody |
---|---|---|
Population | 50,655 | 167 |
Median Age | 37.8 years | 38.9 years |
Median Income | $67,922 | $48,750 |
Married Families | 41.0% | 53.0% |
Poverty Level | 7% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.8 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Cuyahoga falls vs Cody
- In Cuyahoga falls, the population is higher at 50,655, compared to 167 in Cody.
- The median age in Cody is higher at 38.9 years, compared to 37.8 years in Cuyahoga falls.
- Cuyahoga falls has a higher median income of $67,922 compared to $48,750 in Cody.
- In Cody, the percentage of married families is higher at 53.0%, compared to 41.0% in Cuyahoga falls.
- The poverty level is higher in Cody at 12%, compared to 7% in Cuyahoga falls.
- The unemployment rate in Cuyahoga falls is higher at 4.8%, compared to 2.5% in Cody.
Demographics
Demographics Cuyahoga falls vs Cody provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Cuyahoga falls | Cody |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | Data is updating |
White | 81 | 88 |
Asian | 6 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 3 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 5 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 5 |
Demographics Comparison: Cuyahoga falls vs Cody
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cuyahoga falls at 5% compared to 0% in Cody.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cody at 88% compared to 81% in Cuyahoga falls.
- The Asian population is larger in Cuyahoga falls at 6% compared to 0% in Cody.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cuyahoga falls at 3% compared to 0% in Cody.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cody at 7%, compared to 5% in Cuyahoga falls.
- In Cody, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 5%, compared to 0% in Cuyahoga falls.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Cuyahoga falls | Cody |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 14.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 9.9% |
Depression | 25.1% | 17.6% |
Smoking | 18.5% | 17.6% |
Binge Drinking | 18.8% | 20.4% |
Obesity | 41.1% | 37.8% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 25.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cuyahoga falls vs Cody
- More residents in Cuyahoga falls report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 14.4% in Cody.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cuyahoga falls at 25.1% compared to 17.6% in Cody.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cuyahoga falls at 18.5% compared to 17.6% in Cody.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cody at 20.4% compared to 18.8% in Cuyahoga falls.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cuyahoga falls at 41.1% compared to 37.8% in Cody.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cody at 25.0% compared to 13.0% in Cuyahoga falls.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Cuyahoga falls | Cody |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.6% (825) | 1.2% (2) |
High School Diploma | 19.4% (9,813) | 28.1% (47) |
Less than High School | 6.3% (3,197) | 10.8% (18) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.1% (13,215) | 17.4% (29) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cuyahoga falls vs Cody
- A higher percentage of residents in Cuyahoga falls have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 1.2% in Cody.
- In Cody, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.1% compared to 19.4% in Cuyahoga falls.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cody at 10.8%, compared to 6.3% in Cuyahoga falls.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cuyahoga falls hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.1% compared to 17.4% in Cody.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.