Demographics details for Cuyahoga falls, OH vs Carrollton, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Cuyahoga falls, OH vs Carrollton, TX.

Data Cuyahoga falls Carrollton
Population 50,655 133,820
Median Age 37.8 years 38.6 years
Median Income $67,922 $95,380
Married Families 41.0% 44.0%
Poverty Level 7% 9%
Unemployment Rate 4.8 3.7

Population Comparison: Cuyahoga falls vs Carrollton

  • The population in Carrollton is higher at 133,820, compared to 50,655 in Cuyahoga falls.
  • The median age in Carrollton is higher at 38.6 years, compared to 37.8 years in Cuyahoga falls.
  • Carrollton has a higher median income of $95,380, compared to $67,922 in Cuyahoga falls.
  • In Carrollton, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 41.0% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • The poverty level is higher in Carrollton at 9%, compared to 7% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • The unemployment rate in Cuyahoga falls is higher at 4.8%, compared to 3.7% in Carrollton.

Demographics

Demographics Cuyahoga falls vs Carrollton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Cuyahoga falls Carrollton
Black 5 10
White 81 31
Asian 6 15
Hispanic 3 32
Two or More Races 5 12
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Cuyahoga falls vs Carrollton

  • In Carrollton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 5% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • Cuyahoga falls has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 31% in Carrollton.
  • In Carrollton, the Asian population stands at 15%, greater than 6% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • Carrollton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 32%, compared to 3% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Carrollton at 12%, compared to 5% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cuyahoga falls and Carrollton at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Cuyahoga falls Carrollton
Mental Health Not Good 17.1% 15.1%
Physical Health Not Good 11.1% 10.1%
Depression 25.1% 20.9%
Smoking 18.5% 13.5%
Binge Drinking 18.8% 17.7%
Obesity 41.1% 31.5%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 7.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Cuyahoga falls vs Carrollton

  • More residents in Cuyahoga falls report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 15.1% in Carrollton.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Cuyahoga falls at 25.1% compared to 20.9% in Carrollton.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Cuyahoga falls at 18.5% compared to 13.5% in Carrollton.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Cuyahoga falls at 18.8% compared to 17.7% in Carrollton.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Cuyahoga falls at 41.1% compared to 31.5% in Carrollton.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Cuyahoga falls at 13.0% compared to 7.0% in Carrollton.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Cuyahoga falls Carrollton
No Schooling 1.6% (825) 1.6% (2,169)
High School Diploma 19.4% (9,813) 12.3% (16,432)
Less than High School 6.3% (3,197) 13.2% (17,673)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 26.1% (13,215) 29.8% (39,921)

Education Levels Comparison: Cuyahoga falls vs Carrollton

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Cuyahoga falls and Carrollton at 1.6%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Cuyahoga falls hold a high school diploma at 19.4% compared to 12.3% in Carrollton.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Carrollton at 13.2%, compared to 6.3% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • In Carrollton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.8% compared to 26.1% in Cuyahoga falls.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.