Demographics details for Cuyahoga falls, OH vs Burkesville, KY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Cuyahoga falls, OH vs Burkesville, KY.

Data Cuyahoga falls Burkesville
Population 50,655 1,380
Median Age 37.8 years 51.6 years
Median Income $67,922 $26,563
Married Families 41.0% 29.0%
Poverty Level 7% 14%
Unemployment Rate 4.8 3.5

Population Comparison: Cuyahoga falls vs Burkesville

  • In Cuyahoga falls, the population is higher at 50,655, compared to 1,380 in Burkesville.
  • The median age in Burkesville is higher at 51.6 years, compared to 37.8 years in Cuyahoga falls.
  • Cuyahoga falls has a higher median income of $67,922 compared to $26,563 in Burkesville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Cuyahoga falls at 41.0% compared to 29.0% in Burkesville.
  • The poverty level is higher in Burkesville at 14%, compared to 7% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • The unemployment rate in Cuyahoga falls is higher at 4.8%, compared to 3.5% in Burkesville.

Demographics

Demographics Cuyahoga falls vs Burkesville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Cuyahoga falls Burkesville
Black 5 11
White 81 83
Asian 6 1
Hispanic 3 3
Two or More Races 5 2
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Cuyahoga falls vs Burkesville

  • In Burkesville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 5% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Burkesville at 83% compared to 81% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • The Asian population is larger in Cuyahoga falls at 6% compared to 1% in Burkesville.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Cuyahoga falls and Burkesville at 3%.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Cuyahoga falls at 5% compared to 2% in Burkesville.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cuyahoga falls and Burkesville at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Cuyahoga falls Burkesville
Mental Health Not Good 17.1% 21.8%
Physical Health Not Good 11.1% 16.8%
Depression 25.1% 29.6%
Smoking 18.5% 27.1%
Binge Drinking 18.8% 13.7%
Obesity 41.1% 43.9%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 28.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Cuyahoga falls vs Burkesville

  • In Burkesville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.8% compared to 17.1% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Burkesville at 29.6% versus 25.1% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • Burkesville has a higher smoking rate at 27.1% compared to 18.5% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Cuyahoga falls at 18.8% compared to 13.7% in Burkesville.
  • Burkesville has higher obesity rates at 43.9% compared to 41.1% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Burkesville at 28.0% compared to 13.0% in Cuyahoga falls.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Cuyahoga falls Burkesville
No Schooling 1.6% (825) 0.6% (8)
High School Diploma 19.4% (9,813) 32.7% (451)
Less than High School 6.3% (3,197) 35.8% (494)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 26.1% (13,215) 5.2% (72)

Education Levels Comparison: Cuyahoga falls vs Burkesville

  • A higher percentage of residents in Cuyahoga falls have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.6% in Burkesville.
  • In Burkesville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 32.7% compared to 19.4% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Burkesville at 35.8%, compared to 6.3% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Cuyahoga falls hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.1% compared to 5.2% in Burkesville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.