Demographics details for Cuthbert, GA vs Fairfield, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cuthbert, GA vs Fairfield, AL.
| Data | Cuthbert | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,939 | 9,690 |
| Median Age | 37.6 years | 30.7 years |
| Median Income | $21,278 | $45,646 |
| Married Families | 16.0% | 20.0% |
| Poverty Level | 28% | 30% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.5 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Cuthbert vs Fairfield
- The population in Fairfield is higher at 9,690, compared to 2,939 in Cuthbert.
- Residents in Cuthbert have a higher median age of 37.6 years compared to 30.7 years in Fairfield.
- Fairfield has a higher median income of $45,646, compared to $21,278 in Cuthbert.
- In Fairfield, the percentage of married families is higher at 20.0%, compared to 16.0% in Cuthbert.
- The poverty level is higher in Fairfield at 30%, compared to 28% in Cuthbert.
- The unemployment rate in Cuthbert is higher at 5.5%, compared to 5.0% in Fairfield.
Demographics
Demographics Cuthbert vs Fairfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cuthbert | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 92 | 95 |
| White | 1 | 3 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 4 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cuthbert vs Fairfield
- In Fairfield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 95% compared to 92% in Cuthbert.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fairfield at 3% compared to 1% in Cuthbert.
- Both Cuthbert and Fairfield have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cuthbert at 4% compared to 0% in Fairfield.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cuthbert at 3% compared to 2% in Fairfield.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cuthbert and Fairfield at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cuthbert | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.4% | 19.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 18.1% | 14.2% |
| Depression | 20.9% | 19.6% |
| Smoking | 27.3% | 20.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 11.1% | 11.7% |
| Obesity | 50.4% | 48.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cuthbert vs Fairfield
- More residents in Cuthbert report poor mental health at 21.4% compared to 19.7% in Fairfield.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cuthbert at 20.9% compared to 19.6% in Fairfield.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cuthbert at 27.3% compared to 20.6% in Fairfield.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fairfield at 11.7% compared to 11.1% in Cuthbert.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cuthbert at 50.4% compared to 48.1% in Fairfield.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cuthbert at 17.0% compared to 14.0% in Fairfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cuthbert | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.5% (53) |
| High School Diploma | 20.6% (604) | 22.3% (2,159) |
| Less than High School | 17.1% (502) | 3.1% (302) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.6% (282) | 14.8% (1,437) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cuthbert vs Fairfield
- In Fairfield, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Cuthbert.
- In Fairfield, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.3% compared to 20.6% in Cuthbert.
- More residents in Cuthbert have less than a high school education at 17.1% compared to 3.1% in Fairfield.
- In Fairfield, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.8% compared to 9.6% in Cuthbert.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.