Demographics details for Cuthbert, GA vs Canoga park, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Cuthbert, GA vs Canoga park, CA.

Data Cuthbert Canoga park
Population 2,939 58,116
Median Age 37.6 years 39.0 years
Median Income $21,278 $78,500
Married Families 16.0% 18900.0%
Poverty Level 28% 12%
Unemployment Rate 5.5 4.5

Population Comparison: Cuthbert vs Canoga park

  • The population in Canoga park is higher at 58,116, compared to 2,939 in Cuthbert.
  • The median age in Canoga park is higher at 39.0 years, compared to 37.6 years in Cuthbert.
  • Canoga park has a higher median income of $78,500, compared to $21,278 in Cuthbert.
  • In Canoga park, the percentage of married families is higher at 18900.0%, compared to 16.0% in Cuthbert.
  • Cuthbert has a higher poverty level at 28% compared to 12% in Canoga park.
  • The unemployment rate in Cuthbert is higher at 5.5%, compared to 4.5% in Canoga park.

Demographics

Demographics Cuthbert vs Canoga park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Cuthbert Canoga park
Black 92 3
White 1 52
Asian Data is updating 10
Hispanic 4 30
Two or More Races 3 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Cuthbert vs Canoga park

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cuthbert at 92% compared to 3% in Canoga park.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Canoga park at 52% compared to 1% in Cuthbert.
  • In Canoga park, the Asian population stands at 10%, greater than 0% in Cuthbert.
  • Canoga park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 4% in Cuthbert.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Canoga park at 5%, compared to 3% in Cuthbert.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cuthbert and Canoga park at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Cuthbert Canoga park
Mental Health Not Good 21.4% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 18.1% Data is updating%
Depression 20.9% Data is updating%
Smoking 27.3% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 11.1% Data is updating%
Obesity 50.4% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 17.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Cuthbert vs Canoga park

  • More residents in Cuthbert report poor mental health at 21.4% compared to 0.0% in Canoga park.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Cuthbert at 20.9% compared to 0.0% in Canoga park.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Cuthbert at 27.3% compared to 0.0% in Canoga park.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Cuthbert at 11.1% compared to 0.0% in Canoga park.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Cuthbert at 50.4% compared to 0.0% in Canoga park.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Cuthbert at 17.0% compared to 0.0% in Canoga park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Cuthbert Canoga park
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 20.6% (604) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 17.1% (502) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.6% (282) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Cuthbert vs Canoga park

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Cuthbert and Canoga park at 0.0%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Cuthbert hold a high school diploma at 20.6% compared to 0.0% in Canoga park.
  • More residents in Cuthbert have less than a high school education at 17.1% compared to 0.0% in Canoga park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Cuthbert hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.6% compared to 0.0% in Canoga park.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.