Demographics details for Cushing, OK vs Live oak, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cushing, OK vs Live oak, FL.
| Data | Cushing | Live oak |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,345 | 7,034 |
| Median Age | 35.8 years | 37.5 years |
| Median Income | $46,602 | $43,664 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Cushing vs Live oak
- In Cushing, the population is higher at 8,345, compared to 7,034 in Live oak.
- The median age in Live oak is higher at 37.5 years, compared to 35.8 years in Cushing.
- Cushing has a higher median income of $46,602 compared to $43,664 in Live oak.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cushing at 35.0% compared to 31.0% in Live oak.
- The poverty level is higher in Live oak at 16%, compared to 13% in Cushing.
- Live oak has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Cushing.
Demographics
Demographics Cushing vs Live oak provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cushing | Live oak |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 38 |
| White | 70 | 41 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 6 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 12 |
| American Indian | 9 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cushing vs Live oak
- In Live oak, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 38% compared to 6% in Cushing.
- Cushing has a higher percentage of White residents at 70% compared to 41% in Live oak.
- Both Cushing and Live oak have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Live oak has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 6% in Cushing.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Live oak at 12%, compared to 9% in Cushing.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Cushing at 9% compared to 0% in Live oak.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cushing | Live oak |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 17.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.6% | 12.4% |
| Depression | 25.6% | 19.3% |
| Smoking | 22.3% | 22.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 14.9% |
| Obesity | 42.5% | 37.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cushing vs Live oak
- More residents in Cushing report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 17.0% in Live oak.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cushing at 25.6% compared to 19.3% in Live oak.
- Smoking rates are the same in both Cushing and Live oak at 22.3%.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cushing at 15.0% compared to 14.9% in Live oak.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cushing at 42.5% compared to 37.1% in Live oak.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cushing at 15.0% compared to 12.0% in Live oak.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cushing | Live oak |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (41) | 2.1% (147) |
| High School Diploma | 25.8% (2,152) | 25.0% (1,755) |
| Less than High School | 13.3% (1,108) | 11.3% (796) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.0% (918) | 7.7% (545) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cushing vs Live oak
- In Live oak, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.5% in Cushing.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cushing hold a high school diploma at 25.8% compared to 25.0% in Live oak.
- More residents in Cushing have less than a high school education at 13.3% compared to 11.3% in Live oak.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cushing hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.0% compared to 7.7% in Live oak.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.