Demographics details for Cushing, OK vs Boomer, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cushing, OK vs Boomer, NC.
Data | Cushing | Boomer |
---|---|---|
Population | 8,345 | 1,213 |
Median Age | 35.8 years | 53.9 years |
Median Income | $46,602 | $50,367 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Cushing vs Boomer
- In Cushing, the population is higher at 8,345, compared to 1,213 in Boomer.
- The median age in Boomer is higher at 53.9 years, compared to 35.8 years in Cushing.
- Boomer has a higher median income of $50,367, compared to $46,602 in Cushing.
- In Boomer, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 35.0% in Cushing.
- Cushing has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 12% in Boomer.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Cushing and Boomer at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Cushing vs Boomer provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Cushing | Boomer |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | 5 |
White | 70 | 91 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 6 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 2 |
American Indian | 9 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cushing vs Boomer
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cushing at 6% compared to 5% in Boomer.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Boomer at 91% compared to 70% in Cushing.
- Both Cushing and Boomer have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cushing at 6% compared to 2% in Boomer.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cushing at 9% compared to 2% in Boomer.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Cushing at 9% compared to 0% in Boomer.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Cushing | Boomer |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.6% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 25.6% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 22.3% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 15.0% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 42.5% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cushing vs Boomer
- More residents in Cushing report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 0.0% in Boomer.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cushing at 25.6% compared to 0.0% in Boomer.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cushing at 22.3% compared to 0.0% in Boomer.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cushing at 15.0% compared to 0.0% in Boomer.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cushing at 42.5% compared to 0.0% in Boomer.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Boomer at 18.0% compared to 15.0% in Cushing.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Cushing | Boomer |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (41) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 25.8% (2,152) | 21.2% (257) |
Less than High School | 13.3% (1,108) | 25.9% (314) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.0% (918) | 9.6% (116) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cushing vs Boomer
- A higher percentage of residents in Cushing have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Boomer.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cushing hold a high school diploma at 25.8% compared to 21.2% in Boomer.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Boomer at 25.9%, compared to 13.3% in Cushing.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cushing hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.0% compared to 9.6% in Boomer.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.