Demographics details for Curwensville, PA vs South gate, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Curwensville, PA vs South gate, CA.
Data | Curwensville | South gate |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,532 | 90,926 |
Median Age | 38.9 years | 33.7 years |
Median Income | $46,726 | $67,188 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 18% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 6.1 |
Population Comparison: Curwensville vs South gate
- The population in South gate is higher at 90,926, compared to 2,532 in Curwensville.
- Residents in Curwensville have a higher median age of 38.9 years compared to 33.7 years in South gate.
- South gate has a higher median income of $67,188, compared to $46,726 in Curwensville.
- In South gate, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 33.0% in Curwensville.
- The poverty level is higher in South gate at 18%, compared to 12% in Curwensville.
- South gate has a higher unemployment rate at 6.1% compared to 4.2% in Curwensville.
Demographics
Demographics Curwensville vs South gate provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Curwensville | South gate |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 1 |
White | 95 | -21 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | 1 | 97 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 21 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Curwensville vs South gate
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Curwensville and South gate at 1%.
- Curwensville has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to -21% in South gate.
- In South gate, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Curwensville.
- South gate has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 97%, compared to 1% in Curwensville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in South gate at 21%, compared to 3% in Curwensville.
- In South gate, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Curwensville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Curwensville | South gate |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 16.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 14.9% |
Depression | 23.9% | 16.3% |
Smoking | 21.6% | 12.7% |
Binge Drinking | 18.4% | 14.5% |
Obesity | 37.1% | 34.1% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Curwensville vs South gate
- More residents in Curwensville report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 16.8% in South gate.
- Depression is more prevalent in Curwensville at 23.9% compared to 16.3% in South gate.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Curwensville at 21.6% compared to 12.7% in South gate.
- Binge drinking is more common in Curwensville at 18.4% compared to 14.5% in South gate.
- Obesity rates are higher in Curwensville at 37.1% compared to 34.1% in South gate.
- Disability percentages are higher in Curwensville at 18.0% compared to 9.0% in South gate.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Curwensville | South gate |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (12) | 4.6% (4,160) |
High School Diploma | 28.4% (720) | 14.9% (13,536) |
Less than High School | 10.5% (266) | 53.3% (48,481) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.8% (451) | 7.5% (6,822) |
Education Levels Comparison: Curwensville vs South gate
- In South gate, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.6% compared to 0.5% in Curwensville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Curwensville hold a high school diploma at 28.4% compared to 14.9% in South gate.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in South gate at 53.3%, compared to 10.5% in Curwensville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Curwensville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.8% compared to 7.5% in South gate.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.