Demographics details for Cummington, MA vs Girdletree, MD

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Cummington, MA vs Girdletree, MD.

Data Cummington Girdletree
Population 878 122
Median Age 42.0 years 57.4 years
Median Income $75,000 $129,167
Married Families 20.0% 50.0%
Poverty Level 5% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 4.3 Data is updating

Population Comparison: Cummington vs Girdletree

  • In Cummington, the population is higher at 878, compared to 122 in Girdletree.
  • The median age in Girdletree is higher at 57.4 years, compared to 42.0 years in Cummington.
  • Girdletree has a higher median income of $129,167, compared to $75,000 in Cummington.
  • In Girdletree, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 20.0% in Cummington.
  • Cummington has a higher poverty level at 5% compared to 0% in Girdletree.
  • The unemployment rate in Cummington is higher at 4.3%, compared to 0.0% in Girdletree.

Demographics

Demographics Cummington vs Girdletree provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Cummington Girdletree
Black 1 Data is updating
White 97 89
Asian Data is updating 11
Hispanic 1 Data is updating
Two or More Races 1 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Cummington vs Girdletree

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cummington at 1% compared to 0% in Girdletree.
  • Cummington has a higher percentage of White residents at 97% compared to 89% in Girdletree.
  • In Girdletree, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 0% in Cummington.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Cummington at 1% compared to 0% in Girdletree.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Cummington at 1% compared to 0% in Girdletree.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cummington and Girdletree at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Cummington Girdletree
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 16.7%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 10.6%
Depression Data is updating% 20.8%
Smoking Data is updating% 18.7%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 18.8%
Obesity Data is updating% 39.6%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 8.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Cummington vs Girdletree

  • In Girdletree, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 0.0% in Cummington.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Girdletree at 20.8% versus 0.0% in Cummington.
  • Girdletree has a higher smoking rate at 18.7% compared to 0.0% in Cummington.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Girdletree at 18.8% compared to 0.0% in Cummington.
  • Girdletree has higher obesity rates at 39.6% compared to 0.0% in Cummington.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Girdletree at 8.0% compared to 0.0% in Cummington.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Cummington Girdletree
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 44.3% (54)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 19.7% (24)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 5.7% (7)

Education Levels Comparison: Cummington vs Girdletree

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Cummington and Girdletree at 0.0%.
  • In Girdletree, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 44.3% compared to 0.0% in Cummington.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Girdletree at 19.7%, compared to 0.0% in Cummington.
  • In Girdletree, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 5.7% compared to 0.0% in Cummington.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.