Demographics details for Culver city, CA vs Powder springs, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Culver city, CA vs Powder springs, GA.

Data Culver city Powder springs
Population 39,515 17,337
Median Age 41.5 years 38.7 years
Median Income $114,429 $88,311
Married Families 43.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 9% 12%
Unemployment Rate 5.8 3.5

Population Comparison: Culver city vs Powder springs

  • In Culver city, the population is higher at 39,515, compared to 17,337 in Powder springs.
  • Residents in Culver city have a higher median age of 41.5 years compared to 38.7 years in Powder springs.
  • Culver city has a higher median income of $114,429 compared to $88,311 in Powder springs.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Culver city at 43.0% compared to 36.0% in Powder springs.
  • The poverty level is higher in Powder springs at 12%, compared to 9% in Culver city.
  • The unemployment rate in Culver city is higher at 5.8%, compared to 3.5% in Powder springs.

Demographics

Demographics Culver city vs Powder springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Culver city Powder springs
Black 8 51
White 38 22
Asian 18 2
Hispanic 21 19
Two or More Races 15 5
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Culver city vs Powder springs

  • In Powder springs, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 51% compared to 8% in Culver city.
  • Culver city has a higher percentage of White residents at 38% compared to 22% in Powder springs.
  • The Asian population is larger in Culver city at 18% compared to 2% in Powder springs.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Culver city at 21% compared to 19% in Powder springs.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Culver city at 15% compared to 5% in Powder springs.
  • In Powder springs, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Culver city.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Culver city Powder springs
Mental Health Not Good 13.1% 15.0%
Physical Health Not Good 8.1% 10.7%
Depression 15.2% 17.7%
Smoking 7.5% 14.4%
Binge Drinking 16.5% 14.4%
Obesity 24.1% 33.0%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Culver city vs Powder springs

  • In Powder springs, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.0% compared to 13.1% in Culver city.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Powder springs at 17.7% versus 15.2% in Culver city.
  • Powder springs has a higher smoking rate at 14.4% compared to 7.5% in Culver city.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Culver city at 16.5% compared to 14.4% in Powder springs.
  • Powder springs has higher obesity rates at 33.0% compared to 24.1% in Culver city.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Powder springs at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Culver city.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Culver city Powder springs
No Schooling 1.3% (501) 1.3% (225)
High School Diploma 7.6% (3,000) 15.0% (2,598)
Less than High School 9.1% (3,605) 7.6% (1,309)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 49.0% (19,344) 26.3% (4,561)

Education Levels Comparison: Culver city vs Powder springs

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Culver city and Powder springs at 1.3%.
  • In Powder springs, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.0% compared to 7.6% in Culver city.
  • More residents in Culver city have less than a high school education at 9.1% compared to 7.6% in Powder springs.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Culver city hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 49.0% compared to 26.3% in Powder springs.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.