Demographics details for Culver city, CA vs Falls city, NE

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Culver city, CA vs Falls city, NE.

Data Culver city Falls city
Population 39,515 4,052
Median Age 41.5 years 40.6 years
Median Income $114,429 $40,222
Married Families 43.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 9% 13%
Unemployment Rate 5.8 3.5

Population Comparison: Culver city vs Falls city

  • In Culver city, the population is higher at 39,515, compared to 4,052 in Falls city.
  • Residents in Culver city have a higher median age of 41.5 years compared to 40.6 years in Falls city.
  • Culver city has a higher median income of $114,429 compared to $40,222 in Falls city.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Culver city at 43.0% compared to 38.0% in Falls city.
  • The poverty level is higher in Falls city at 13%, compared to 9% in Culver city.
  • The unemployment rate in Culver city is higher at 5.8%, compared to 3.5% in Falls city.

Demographics

Demographics Culver city vs Falls city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Culver city Falls city
Black 8 1
White 38 91
Asian 18 Data is updating
Hispanic 21 Data is updating
Two or More Races 15 5
American Indian Data is updating 3

Demographics Comparison: Culver city vs Falls city

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Culver city at 8% compared to 1% in Falls city.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Falls city at 91% compared to 38% in Culver city.
  • The Asian population is larger in Culver city at 18% compared to 0% in Falls city.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Culver city at 21% compared to 0% in Falls city.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Culver city at 15% compared to 5% in Falls city.
  • In Falls city, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Culver city.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Culver city Falls city
Mental Health Not Good 13.1% 14.9%
Physical Health Not Good 8.1% 10.9%
Depression 15.2% 17.2%
Smoking 7.5% 19.3%
Binge Drinking 16.5% 20.4%
Obesity 24.1% 43.9%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Culver city vs Falls city

  • In Falls city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.9% compared to 13.1% in Culver city.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Falls city at 17.2% versus 15.2% in Culver city.
  • Falls city has a higher smoking rate at 19.3% compared to 7.5% in Culver city.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Falls city at 20.4% compared to 16.5% in Culver city.
  • Falls city has higher obesity rates at 43.9% compared to 24.1% in Culver city.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Falls city at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in Culver city.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Culver city Falls city
No Schooling 1.3% (501) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 7.6% (3,000) 26.2% (1,063)
Less than High School 9.1% (3,605) 8.6% (349)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 49.0% (19,344) 14.8% (598)

Education Levels Comparison: Culver city vs Falls city

  • A higher percentage of residents in Culver city have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.0% in Falls city.
  • In Falls city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.2% compared to 7.6% in Culver city.
  • More residents in Culver city have less than a high school education at 9.1% compared to 8.6% in Falls city.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Culver city hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 49.0% compared to 14.8% in Falls city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.