Demographics details for Cullom, IL vs Three oaks, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cullom, IL vs Three oaks, MI.
| Data | Cullom | Three oaks |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 511 | 1,397 |
| Median Age | 41.6 years | 40.4 years |
| Median Income | $58,472 | $57,083 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 2.9 |
Population Comparison: Cullom vs Three oaks
- The population in Three oaks is higher at 1,397, compared to 511 in Cullom.
- Residents in Cullom have a higher median age of 41.6 years compared to 40.4 years in Three oaks.
- Cullom has a higher median income of $58,472 compared to $57,083 in Three oaks.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cullom at 35.0% compared to 27.0% in Three oaks.
- The poverty level is higher in Three oaks at 12%, compared to 9% in Cullom.
- The unemployment rate in Cullom is higher at 3.5%, compared to 2.9% in Three oaks.
Demographics
Demographics Cullom vs Three oaks provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cullom | Three oaks |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 82 | 52 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 11 | 26 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 21 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cullom vs Three oaks
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Cullom and Three oaks at 0%.
- Cullom has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 52% in Three oaks.
- In Three oaks, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Cullom.
- Three oaks has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 26%, compared to 11% in Cullom.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Three oaks at 21%, compared to 7% in Cullom.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cullom and Three oaks at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cullom | Three oaks |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 17.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 10.8% |
| Depression | 23.0% | 25.3% |
| Smoking | 18.7% | 17.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 19.4% |
| Obesity | 38.7% | 35.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cullom vs Three oaks
- More residents in Cullom report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 17.0% in Three oaks.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Three oaks at 25.3% versus 23.0% in Cullom.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cullom at 18.7% compared to 17.8% in Three oaks.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Three oaks at 19.4% compared to 17.9% in Cullom.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cullom at 38.7% compared to 35.0% in Three oaks.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cullom at 23.0% compared to 11.0% in Three oaks.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cullom | Three oaks |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.2% (11) | 1.8% (25) |
| High School Diploma | 19.0% (97) | 16.2% (226) |
| Less than High School | 11.4% (58) | 8.2% (114) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.4% (48) | 12.2% (171) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cullom vs Three oaks
- A higher percentage of residents in Cullom have no formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 1.8% in Three oaks.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cullom hold a high school diploma at 19.0% compared to 16.2% in Three oaks.
- More residents in Cullom have less than a high school education at 11.4% compared to 8.2% in Three oaks.
- In Three oaks, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.2% compared to 9.4% in Cullom.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.