Demographics details for Cullom, IL vs Breckenridge, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cullom, IL vs Breckenridge, TX.
Data | Cullom | Breckenridge |
---|---|---|
Population | 511 | 5,177 |
Median Age | 41.6 years | 35.1 years |
Median Income | $58,472 | $38,500 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 33.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Cullom vs Breckenridge
- The population in Breckenridge is higher at 5,177, compared to 511 in Cullom.
- Residents in Cullom have a higher median age of 41.6 years compared to 35.1 years in Breckenridge.
- Cullom has a higher median income of $58,472 compared to $38,500 in Breckenridge.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cullom at 35.0% compared to 33.0% in Breckenridge.
- The poverty level is higher in Breckenridge at 15%, compared to 9% in Cullom.
- Breckenridge has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Cullom.
Demographics
Demographics Cullom vs Breckenridge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Cullom | Breckenridge |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 3 |
White | 82 | 42 |
Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
Hispanic | 11 | 39 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 13 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Cullom vs Breckenridge
- In Breckenridge, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Cullom.
- Cullom has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 42% in Breckenridge.
- In Breckenridge, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Cullom.
- Breckenridge has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 39%, compared to 11% in Cullom.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Breckenridge at 13%, compared to 7% in Cullom.
- In Breckenridge, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Cullom.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Cullom | Breckenridge |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 19.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 14.2% |
Depression | 23.0% | 25.6% |
Smoking | 18.7% | 21.1% |
Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 17.5% |
Obesity | 38.7% | 38.0% |
Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cullom vs Breckenridge
- In Breckenridge, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 17.2% in Cullom.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Breckenridge at 25.6% versus 23.0% in Cullom.
- Breckenridge has a higher smoking rate at 21.1% compared to 18.7% in Cullom.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cullom at 17.9% compared to 17.5% in Breckenridge.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cullom at 38.7% compared to 38.0% in Breckenridge.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cullom at 23.0% compared to 18.0% in Breckenridge.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Cullom | Breckenridge |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.2% (11) | 2.4% (126) |
High School Diploma | 19.0% (97) | 14.7% (763) |
Less than High School | 11.4% (58) | 26.3% (1,361) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.4% (48) | 9.2% (477) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cullom vs Breckenridge
- In Breckenridge, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 2.2% in Cullom.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cullom hold a high school diploma at 19.0% compared to 14.7% in Breckenridge.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Breckenridge at 26.3%, compared to 11.4% in Cullom.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cullom hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.4% compared to 9.2% in Breckenridge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.