Demographics details for Cullman, AL vs Scotia, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cullman, AL vs Scotia, CA.
| Data | Cullman | Scotia |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 19,251 | 510 |
| Median Age | 42.0 years | 31.9 years |
| Median Income | $59,982 | $61,250 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 26.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Cullman vs Scotia
- In Cullman, the population is higher at 19,251, compared to 510 in Scotia.
- Residents in Cullman have a higher median age of 42.0 years compared to 31.9 years in Scotia.
- Scotia has a higher median income of $61,250, compared to $59,982 in Cullman.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cullman at 39.0% compared to 26.0% in Scotia.
- The poverty level is higher in Scotia at 18%, compared to 12% in Cullman.
- Scotia has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.3% in Cullman.
Demographics
Demographics Cullman vs Scotia provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cullman | Scotia |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 92 | 67 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 25 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Cullman vs Scotia
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cullman at 1% compared to 0% in Scotia.
- Cullman has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 67% in Scotia.
- The Asian population is larger in Cullman at 1% compared to 0% in Scotia.
- Scotia has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 2% in Cullman.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Scotia at 25%, compared to 4% in Cullman.
- In Scotia, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Cullman.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cullman | Scotia |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | 18.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.6% | 11.8% |
| Depression | 24.9% | 23.0% |
| Smoking | 18.2% | 15.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 19.2% |
| Obesity | 37.5% | 32.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cullman vs Scotia
- More residents in Cullman report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 18.1% in Scotia.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cullman at 24.9% compared to 23.0% in Scotia.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cullman at 18.2% compared to 15.3% in Scotia.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Scotia at 19.2% compared to 16.4% in Cullman.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cullman at 37.5% compared to 32.6% in Scotia.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Scotia at 18.0% compared to 14.0% in Cullman.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cullman | Scotia |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (130) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 13.6% (2,614) | 13.1% (67) |
| Less than High School | 13.0% (2,512) | 3.1% (16) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.1% (4,253) | 15.3% (78) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cullman vs Scotia
- A higher percentage of residents in Cullman have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Scotia.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cullman hold a high school diploma at 13.6% compared to 13.1% in Scotia.
- More residents in Cullman have less than a high school education at 13.0% compared to 3.1% in Scotia.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cullman hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.1% compared to 15.3% in Scotia.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.