Demographics details for Cullman, AL vs Potts camp, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cullman, AL vs Potts camp, MS.
| Data | Cullman | Potts camp |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 19,251 | 409 |
| Median Age | 42.0 years | 45.6 years |
| Median Income | $59,982 | $21,845 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 20.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 25% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Cullman vs Potts camp
- In Cullman, the population is higher at 19,251, compared to 409 in Potts camp.
- The median age in Potts camp is higher at 45.6 years, compared to 42.0 years in Cullman.
- Cullman has a higher median income of $59,982 compared to $21,845 in Potts camp.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cullman at 39.0% compared to 20.0% in Potts camp.
- The poverty level is higher in Potts camp at 25%, compared to 12% in Cullman.
- Potts camp has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.3% in Cullman.
Demographics
Demographics Cullman vs Potts camp provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cullman | Potts camp |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 13 |
| White | 92 | 80 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cullman vs Potts camp
- In Potts camp, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 13% compared to 1% in Cullman.
- Cullman has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 80% in Potts camp.
- The Asian population is larger in Cullman at 1% compared to 0% in Potts camp.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cullman at 2% compared to 0% in Potts camp.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Potts camp at 7%, compared to 4% in Cullman.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cullman and Potts camp at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cullman | Potts camp |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | 17.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.6% | 13.0% |
| Depression | 24.9% | 23.0% |
| Smoking | 18.2% | 21.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 13.8% |
| Obesity | 37.5% | 41.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cullman vs Potts camp
- More residents in Cullman report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 17.4% in Potts camp.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cullman at 24.9% compared to 23.0% in Potts camp.
- Potts camp has a higher smoking rate at 21.7% compared to 18.2% in Cullman.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cullman at 16.4% compared to 13.8% in Potts camp.
- Potts camp has higher obesity rates at 41.8% compared to 37.5% in Cullman.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Potts camp at 20.0% compared to 14.0% in Cullman.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cullman | Potts camp |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (130) | 0.5% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 13.6% (2,614) | 13.7% (56) |
| Less than High School | 13.0% (2,512) | 12.0% (49) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.1% (4,253) | 8.1% (33) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cullman vs Potts camp
- A higher percentage of residents in Cullman have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.5% in Potts camp.
- In Potts camp, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.7% compared to 13.6% in Cullman.
- More residents in Cullman have less than a high school education at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Potts camp.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cullman hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.1% compared to 8.1% in Potts camp.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.