Demographics details for Cullman, AL vs Middletown, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cullman, AL vs Middletown, OH.
| Data | Cullman | Middletown |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 19,251 | 51,229 |
| Median Age | 42.0 years | 38.6 years |
| Median Income | $59,982 | $50,457 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 6.5 |
Population Comparison: Cullman vs Middletown
- The population in Middletown is higher at 51,229, compared to 19,251 in Cullman.
- Residents in Cullman have a higher median age of 42.0 years compared to 38.6 years in Middletown.
- Cullman has a higher median income of $59,982 compared to $50,457 in Middletown.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cullman at 39.0% compared to 30.0% in Middletown.
- Cullman has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in Middletown.
- Middletown has a higher unemployment rate at 6.5% compared to 4.3% in Cullman.
Demographics
Demographics Cullman vs Middletown provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cullman | Middletown |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 12 |
| White | 92 | 76 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cullman vs Middletown
- In Middletown, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 1% in Cullman.
- Cullman has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 76% in Middletown.
- Both Cullman and Middletown have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Middletown has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 2% in Cullman.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Middletown at 7%, compared to 4% in Cullman.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cullman and Middletown at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cullman | Middletown |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | 19.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.6% | 14.6% |
| Depression | 24.9% | 24.9% |
| Smoking | 18.2% | 25.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 16.8% |
| Obesity | 37.5% | 48.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cullman vs Middletown
- In Middletown, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 18.5% in Cullman.
- Both cities have comparable depression rates at 24.9%.
- Middletown has a higher smoking rate at 25.5% compared to 18.2% in Cullman.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Middletown at 16.8% compared to 16.4% in Cullman.
- Middletown has higher obesity rates at 48.6% compared to 37.5% in Cullman.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Middletown at 19.0% compared to 14.0% in Cullman.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cullman | Middletown |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (130) | 0.7% (335) |
| High School Diploma | 13.6% (2,614) | 22.3% (11,448) |
| Less than High School | 13.0% (2,512) | 18.6% (9,535) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.1% (4,253) | 10.8% (5,528) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cullman vs Middletown
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Cullman and Middletown at 0.7%.
- In Middletown, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.3% compared to 13.6% in Cullman.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Middletown at 18.6%, compared to 13.0% in Cullman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cullman hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.1% compared to 10.8% in Middletown.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.