Demographics details for Cullman, AL vs Ferndale, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cullman, AL vs Ferndale, NY.
| Data | Cullman | Ferndale |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 19,251 | 519 |
| Median Age | 42.0 years | 43.0 years |
| Median Income | $59,982 | $65,000 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 60.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Cullman vs Ferndale
- In Cullman, the population is higher at 19,251, compared to 519 in Ferndale.
- The median age in Ferndale is higher at 43.0 years, compared to 42.0 years in Cullman.
- Ferndale has a higher median income of $65,000, compared to $59,982 in Cullman.
- In Ferndale, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 39.0% in Cullman.
- Cullman has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Ferndale.
- The unemployment rate in Cullman is higher at 4.3%, compared to 3.0% in Ferndale.
Demographics
Demographics Cullman vs Ferndale provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cullman | Ferndale |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 5 |
| White | 92 | 90 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cullman vs Ferndale
- In Ferndale, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 1% in Cullman.
- Cullman has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 90% in Ferndale.
- In Ferndale, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Cullman.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Cullman and Ferndale at 2%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cullman at 4% compared to 1% in Ferndale.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cullman and Ferndale at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cullman | Ferndale |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.6% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 24.9% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 18.2% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.4% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 37.5% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cullman vs Ferndale
- More residents in Cullman report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 0.0% in Ferndale.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cullman at 24.9% compared to 0.0% in Ferndale.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cullman at 18.2% compared to 0.0% in Ferndale.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cullman at 16.4% compared to 0.0% in Ferndale.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cullman at 37.5% compared to 0.0% in Ferndale.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cullman at 14.0% compared to 0.0% in Ferndale.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cullman | Ferndale |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (130) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 13.6% (2,614) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 13.0% (2,512) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.1% (4,253) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cullman vs Ferndale
- A higher percentage of residents in Cullman have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Ferndale.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cullman hold a high school diploma at 13.6% compared to 0.0% in Ferndale.
- More residents in Cullman have less than a high school education at 13.0% compared to 0.0% in Ferndale.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cullman hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.1% compared to 0.0% in Ferndale.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.