Demographics details for Culleoka, TN vs South jordan, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Culleoka, TN vs South jordan, UT.
Data | Culleoka | South jordan |
---|---|---|
Population | 340 | 83,513 |
Median Age | 36.0 years | 34.4 years |
Median Income | $50,000 | $119,822 |
Married Families | 70.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Culleoka vs South jordan
- The population in South jordan is higher at 83,513, compared to 340 in Culleoka.
- Residents in Culleoka have a higher median age of 36.0 years compared to 34.4 years in South jordan.
- South jordan has a higher median income of $119,822, compared to $50,000 in Culleoka.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Culleoka at 70.0% compared to 44.0% in South jordan.
- Culleoka has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in South jordan.
- The unemployment rate in Culleoka is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.7% in South jordan.
Demographics
Demographics Culleoka vs South jordan provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Culleoka | South jordan |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | Data is updating |
White | 90 | 83 |
Asian | 2 | 4 |
Hispanic | 3 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 1 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Culleoka vs South jordan
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Culleoka at 4% compared to 0% in South jordan.
- Culleoka has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 83% in South jordan.
- In South jordan, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 2% in Culleoka.
- South jordan has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 3% in Culleoka.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in South jordan at 5%, compared to 1% in Culleoka.
- In South jordan, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Culleoka.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Culleoka | South jordan |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 16.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 9.0% |
Depression | Data is updating% | 26.5% |
Smoking | Data is updating% | 7.3% |
Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 16.9% |
Obesity | Data is updating% | 28.6% |
Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Culleoka vs South jordan
- In South jordan, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 0.0% in Culleoka.
- Higher depression rates are seen in South jordan at 26.5% versus 0.0% in Culleoka.
- South jordan has a higher smoking rate at 7.3% compared to 0.0% in Culleoka.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in South jordan at 16.9% compared to 0.0% in Culleoka.
- South jordan has higher obesity rates at 28.6% compared to 0.0% in Culleoka.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in South jordan at 6.0% compared to 0.0% in Culleoka.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Culleoka | South jordan |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.2% (172) |
High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 8.4% (6,995) |
Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.7% (2,236) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 27.1% (22,648) |
Education Levels Comparison: Culleoka vs South jordan
- In South jordan, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Culleoka.
- In South jordan, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 8.4% compared to 0.0% in Culleoka.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in South jordan at 2.7%, compared to 0.0% in Culleoka.
- In South jordan, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.1% compared to 0.0% in Culleoka.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.