Demographics details for Cudahy, WI vs Thomaston, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cudahy, WI vs Thomaston, GA.
| Data | Cudahy | Thomaston |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 17,796 | 9,858 |
| Median Age | 42.4 years | 36.7 years |
| Median Income | $66,592 | $30,298 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 23.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 28% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Cudahy vs Thomaston
- In Cudahy, the population is higher at 17,796, compared to 9,858 in Thomaston.
- Residents in Cudahy have a higher median age of 42.4 years compared to 36.7 years in Thomaston.
- Cudahy has a higher median income of $66,592 compared to $30,298 in Thomaston.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cudahy at 39.0% compared to 23.0% in Thomaston.
- The poverty level is higher in Thomaston at 28%, compared to 11% in Cudahy.
- Thomaston has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Cudahy.
Demographics
Demographics Cudahy vs Thomaston provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cudahy | Thomaston |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 38 |
| White | 77 | 56 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cudahy vs Thomaston
- In Thomaston, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 38% compared to 3% in Cudahy.
- Cudahy has a higher percentage of White residents at 77% compared to 56% in Thomaston.
- The Asian population is larger in Cudahy at 2% compared to 1% in Thomaston.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cudahy at 9% compared to 3% in Thomaston.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cudahy at 9% compared to 2% in Thomaston.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cudahy and Thomaston at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cudahy | Thomaston |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 19.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | 14.6% |
| Depression | 24.3% | 22.4% |
| Smoking | 16.4% | 22.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 26.4% | 13.9% |
| Obesity | 34.2% | 39.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cudahy vs Thomaston
- In Thomaston, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 15.5% in Cudahy.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cudahy at 24.3% compared to 22.4% in Thomaston.
- Thomaston has a higher smoking rate at 22.2% compared to 16.4% in Cudahy.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cudahy at 26.4% compared to 13.9% in Thomaston.
- Thomaston has higher obesity rates at 39.8% compared to 34.2% in Cudahy.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Cudahy and Thomaston at 16.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cudahy | Thomaston |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (166) | 2.7% (264) |
| High School Diploma | 25.1% (4,460) | 14.9% (1,473) |
| Less than High School | 9.9% (1,768) | 13.3% (1,308) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.0% (3,730) | 11.7% (1,153) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cudahy vs Thomaston
- In Thomaston, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.9% in Cudahy.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cudahy hold a high school diploma at 25.1% compared to 14.9% in Thomaston.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Thomaston at 13.3%, compared to 9.9% in Cudahy.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cudahy hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.0% compared to 11.7% in Thomaston.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.