Demographics details for Cudahy, WI vs Stoughton, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cudahy, WI vs Stoughton, MA.
| Data | Cudahy | Stoughton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 17,796 | 28,950 |
| Median Age | 42.4 years | 40.0 years |
| Median Income | $66,592 | $86,000 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 54.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Cudahy vs Stoughton
- The population in Stoughton is higher at 28,950, compared to 17,796 in Cudahy.
- Residents in Cudahy have a higher median age of 42.4 years compared to 40.0 years in Stoughton.
- Stoughton has a higher median income of $86,000, compared to $66,592 in Cudahy.
- In Stoughton, the percentage of married families is higher at 54.0%, compared to 39.0% in Cudahy.
- Cudahy has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 5% in Stoughton.
- Stoughton has a higher unemployment rate at 3.7% compared to 3.5% in Cudahy.
Demographics
Demographics Cudahy vs Stoughton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cudahy | Stoughton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 7 |
| White | 77 | 72 |
| Asian | 2 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cudahy vs Stoughton
- In Stoughton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 3% in Cudahy.
- Cudahy has a higher percentage of White residents at 77% compared to 72% in Stoughton.
- In Stoughton, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 2% in Cudahy.
- Stoughton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 9% in Cudahy.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cudahy at 9% compared to 4% in Stoughton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cudahy and Stoughton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cudahy | Stoughton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 24.3% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 16.4% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 26.4% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 34.2% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cudahy vs Stoughton
- More residents in Cudahy report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 0.0% in Stoughton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cudahy at 24.3% compared to 0.0% in Stoughton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cudahy at 16.4% compared to 0.0% in Stoughton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cudahy at 26.4% compared to 0.0% in Stoughton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cudahy at 34.2% compared to 0.0% in Stoughton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cudahy at 16.0% compared to 0.0% in Stoughton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cudahy | Stoughton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (166) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 25.1% (4,460) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 9.9% (1,768) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.0% (3,730) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cudahy vs Stoughton
- A higher percentage of residents in Cudahy have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Stoughton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cudahy hold a high school diploma at 25.1% compared to 0.0% in Stoughton.
- More residents in Cudahy have less than a high school education at 9.9% compared to 0.0% in Stoughton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cudahy hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.0% compared to 0.0% in Stoughton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.