Demographics details for Cudahy, WI vs Manns choice, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cudahy, WI vs Manns choice, PA.
| Data | Cudahy | Manns choice |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 17,796 | 312 |
| Median Age | 42.4 years | 37.1 years |
| Median Income | $66,592 | $47,500 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Cudahy vs Manns choice
- In Cudahy, the population is higher at 17,796, compared to 312 in Manns choice.
- Residents in Cudahy have a higher median age of 42.4 years compared to 37.1 years in Manns choice.
- Cudahy has a higher median income of $66,592 compared to $47,500 in Manns choice.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cudahy at 39.0% compared to 34.0% in Manns choice.
- Cudahy has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 0% in Manns choice.
- The unemployment rate in Cudahy is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Manns choice.
Demographics
Demographics Cudahy vs Manns choice provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cudahy | Manns choice |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | Data is updating |
| White | 77 | 97 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 9 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cudahy vs Manns choice
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cudahy at 3% compared to 0% in Manns choice.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Manns choice at 97% compared to 77% in Cudahy.
- The Asian population is larger in Cudahy at 2% compared to 0% in Manns choice.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cudahy at 9% compared to 0% in Manns choice.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cudahy at 9% compared to 3% in Manns choice.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cudahy and Manns choice at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cudahy | Manns choice |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | 12.2% |
| Depression | 24.3% | 24.1% |
| Smoking | 16.4% | 21.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 26.4% | 18.8% |
| Obesity | 34.2% | 36.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cudahy vs Manns choice
- In Manns choice, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 15.5% in Cudahy.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cudahy at 24.3% compared to 24.1% in Manns choice.
- Manns choice has a higher smoking rate at 21.7% compared to 16.4% in Cudahy.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cudahy at 26.4% compared to 18.8% in Manns choice.
- Manns choice has higher obesity rates at 36.7% compared to 34.2% in Cudahy.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cudahy at 16.0% compared to 8.0% in Manns choice.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cudahy | Manns choice |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (166) | 1.0% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 25.1% (4,460) | 31.4% (98) |
| Less than High School | 9.9% (1,768) | 11.5% (36) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.0% (3,730) | 1.0% (3) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cudahy vs Manns choice
- In Manns choice, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.9% in Cudahy.
- In Manns choice, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 31.4% compared to 25.1% in Cudahy.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Manns choice at 11.5%, compared to 9.9% in Cudahy.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cudahy hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.0% compared to 1.0% in Manns choice.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.