Demographics details for Cudahy, WI vs Central square, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cudahy, WI vs Central square, NY.
Data | Cudahy | Central square |
---|---|---|
Population | 17,796 | 1,852 |
Median Age | 42.4 years | 41.0 years |
Median Income | $66,592 | $58,824 |
Married Families | 39.0% | 45.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Cudahy vs Central square
- In Cudahy, the population is higher at 17,796, compared to 1,852 in Central square.
- Residents in Cudahy have a higher median age of 42.4 years compared to 41.0 years in Central square.
- Cudahy has a higher median income of $66,592 compared to $58,824 in Central square.
- In Central square, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 39.0% in Cudahy.
- Cudahy has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 8% in Central square.
- Central square has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Cudahy.
Demographics
Demographics Cudahy vs Central square provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Cudahy | Central square |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 1 |
White | 77 | 97 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 9 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 9 | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cudahy vs Central square
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cudahy at 3% compared to 1% in Central square.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Central square at 97% compared to 77% in Cudahy.
- The Asian population is larger in Cudahy at 2% compared to 0% in Central square.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cudahy at 9% compared to 0% in Central square.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cudahy at 9% compared to 2% in Central square.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cudahy and Central square at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Cudahy | Central square |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 17.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | 11.8% |
Depression | 24.3% | 26.8% |
Smoking | 16.4% | 21.2% |
Binge Drinking | 26.4% | 19.3% |
Obesity | 34.2% | 40.3% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cudahy vs Central square
- In Central square, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 15.5% in Cudahy.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Central square at 26.8% versus 24.3% in Cudahy.
- Central square has a higher smoking rate at 21.2% compared to 16.4% in Cudahy.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cudahy at 26.4% compared to 19.3% in Central square.
- Central square has higher obesity rates at 40.3% compared to 34.2% in Cudahy.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Central square at 18.0% compared to 16.0% in Cudahy.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Cudahy | Central square |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (166) | 0.1% (1) |
High School Diploma | 25.1% (4,460) | 14.2% (263) |
Less than High School | 9.9% (1,768) | 11.0% (204) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.0% (3,730) | 19.2% (356) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cudahy vs Central square
- A higher percentage of residents in Cudahy have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.1% in Central square.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cudahy hold a high school diploma at 25.1% compared to 14.2% in Central square.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Central square at 11.0%, compared to 9.9% in Cudahy.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cudahy hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.0% compared to 19.2% in Central square.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.