Demographics details for Cudahy, WI vs Blytheville, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cudahy, WI vs Blytheville, AR.
| Data | Cudahy | Blytheville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 17,796 | 12,706 |
| Median Age | 42.4 years | 38.1 years |
| Median Income | $66,592 | $45,746 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 21% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Cudahy vs Blytheville
- In Cudahy, the population is higher at 17,796, compared to 12,706 in Blytheville.
- Residents in Cudahy have a higher median age of 42.4 years compared to 38.1 years in Blytheville.
- Cudahy has a higher median income of $66,592 compared to $45,746 in Blytheville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cudahy at 39.0% compared to 33.0% in Blytheville.
- The poverty level is higher in Blytheville at 21%, compared to 11% in Cudahy.
- Blytheville has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Cudahy.
Demographics
Demographics Cudahy vs Blytheville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cudahy | Blytheville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 64 |
| White | 77 | 29 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 9 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cudahy vs Blytheville
- In Blytheville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 64% compared to 3% in Cudahy.
- Cudahy has a higher percentage of White residents at 77% compared to 29% in Blytheville.
- The Asian population is larger in Cudahy at 2% compared to 0% in Blytheville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cudahy at 9% compared to 5% in Blytheville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cudahy at 9% compared to 2% in Blytheville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cudahy and Blytheville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cudahy | Blytheville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 20.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | 16.0% |
| Depression | 24.3% | 24.9% |
| Smoking | 16.4% | 26.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 26.4% | 12.2% |
| Obesity | 34.2% | 42.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cudahy vs Blytheville
- In Blytheville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 15.5% in Cudahy.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Blytheville at 24.9% versus 24.3% in Cudahy.
- Blytheville has a higher smoking rate at 26.3% compared to 16.4% in Cudahy.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cudahy at 26.4% compared to 12.2% in Blytheville.
- Blytheville has higher obesity rates at 42.0% compared to 34.2% in Cudahy.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cudahy at 16.0% compared to 15.0% in Blytheville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cudahy | Blytheville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (166) | 1.0% (133) |
| High School Diploma | 25.1% (4,460) | 24.0% (3,051) |
| Less than High School | 9.9% (1,768) | 12.5% (1,585) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.0% (3,730) | 10.6% (1,349) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cudahy vs Blytheville
- In Blytheville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.9% in Cudahy.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cudahy hold a high school diploma at 25.1% compared to 24.0% in Blytheville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Blytheville at 12.5%, compared to 9.9% in Cudahy.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cudahy hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.0% compared to 10.6% in Blytheville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.