Demographics details for Cudahy, WI vs Belgrade, MT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cudahy, WI vs Belgrade, MT.
Data | Cudahy | Belgrade |
---|---|---|
Population | 17,796 | 11,966 |
Median Age | 42.4 years | 33.4 years |
Median Income | $66,592 | $82,769 |
Married Families | 39.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Cudahy vs Belgrade
- In Cudahy, the population is higher at 17,796, compared to 11,966 in Belgrade.
- Residents in Cudahy have a higher median age of 42.4 years compared to 33.4 years in Belgrade.
- Belgrade has a higher median income of $82,769, compared to $66,592 in Cudahy.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cudahy at 39.0% compared to 36.0% in Belgrade.
- Cudahy has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 6% in Belgrade.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Cudahy and Belgrade at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Cudahy vs Belgrade provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Cudahy | Belgrade |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | Data is updating |
White | 77 | 93 |
Asian | 2 | 1 |
Hispanic | 9 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Cudahy vs Belgrade
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cudahy at 3% compared to 0% in Belgrade.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Belgrade at 93% compared to 77% in Cudahy.
- The Asian population is larger in Cudahy at 2% compared to 1% in Belgrade.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cudahy at 9% compared to 2% in Belgrade.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cudahy at 9% compared to 3% in Belgrade.
- In Belgrade, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Cudahy.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Cudahy | Belgrade |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 14.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | 9.4% |
Depression | 24.3% | 23.1% |
Smoking | 16.4% | 14.1% |
Binge Drinking | 26.4% | 23.9% |
Obesity | 34.2% | 24.6% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cudahy vs Belgrade
- More residents in Cudahy report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 14.8% in Belgrade.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cudahy at 24.3% compared to 23.1% in Belgrade.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cudahy at 16.4% compared to 14.1% in Belgrade.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cudahy at 26.4% compared to 23.9% in Belgrade.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cudahy at 34.2% compared to 24.6% in Belgrade.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cudahy at 16.0% compared to 7.0% in Belgrade.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Cudahy | Belgrade |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (166) | 0.2% (25) |
High School Diploma | 25.1% (4,460) | 14.4% (1,727) |
Less than High School | 9.9% (1,768) | 2.5% (301) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.0% (3,730) | 22.3% (2,670) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cudahy vs Belgrade
- A higher percentage of residents in Cudahy have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.2% in Belgrade.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cudahy hold a high school diploma at 25.1% compared to 14.4% in Belgrade.
- More residents in Cudahy have less than a high school education at 9.9% compared to 2.5% in Belgrade.
- In Belgrade, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.3% compared to 21.0% in Cudahy.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.