Demographics details for Cuba, IL vs Pleasanton, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cuba, IL vs Pleasanton, CA.
| Data | Cuba | Pleasanton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,157 | 76,689 |
| Median Age | 50.9 years | 41.5 years |
| Median Income | $43,750 | $181,639 |
| Married Families | 26.0% | 53.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: Cuba vs Pleasanton
- The population in Pleasanton is higher at 76,689, compared to 1,157 in Cuba.
- Residents in Cuba have a higher median age of 50.9 years compared to 41.5 years in Pleasanton.
- Pleasanton has a higher median income of $181,639, compared to $43,750 in Cuba.
- In Pleasanton, the percentage of married families is higher at 53.0%, compared to 26.0% in Cuba.
- Cuba has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 7% in Pleasanton.
- Pleasanton has a higher unemployment rate at 4.3% compared to 4.0% in Cuba.
Demographics
Demographics Cuba vs Pleasanton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cuba | Pleasanton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 2 |
| White | 93 | 37 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 42 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cuba vs Pleasanton
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Cuba and Pleasanton at 2%.
- Cuba has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 37% in Pleasanton.
- In Pleasanton, the Asian population stands at 42%, greater than 0% in Cuba.
- Pleasanton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 2% in Cuba.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pleasanton at 7%, compared to 3% in Cuba.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cuba and Pleasanton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cuba | Pleasanton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.1% | 13.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | 7.3% |
| Depression | 22.1% | 17.6% |
| Smoking | 16.8% | 7.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 17.2% |
| Obesity | 34.8% | 22.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cuba vs Pleasanton
- More residents in Cuba report poor mental health at 16.1% compared to 13.1% in Pleasanton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cuba at 22.1% compared to 17.6% in Pleasanton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cuba at 16.8% compared to 7.2% in Pleasanton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cuba at 18.2% compared to 17.2% in Pleasanton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cuba at 34.8% compared to 22.9% in Pleasanton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cuba at 14.0% compared to 8.0% in Pleasanton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cuba | Pleasanton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (7) | 0.5% (407) |
| High School Diploma | 24.2% (280) | 6.2% (4,722) |
| Less than High School | 13.5% (156) | 3.8% (2,941) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.2% (83) | 49.3% (37,825) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cuba vs Pleasanton
- A higher percentage of residents in Cuba have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.5% in Pleasanton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cuba hold a high school diploma at 24.2% compared to 6.2% in Pleasanton.
- More residents in Cuba have less than a high school education at 13.5% compared to 3.8% in Pleasanton.
- In Pleasanton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 49.3% compared to 7.2% in Cuba.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.