Demographics details for Crystal springs, MS vs Rosemead, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Crystal springs, MS vs Rosemead, CA.

Data Crystal springs Rosemead
Population 4,700 49,791
Median Age 45.3 years 43.1 years
Median Income $44,653 $70,073
Married Families 28.0% 42.0%
Poverty Level 12% 14%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 5.6

Population Comparison: Crystal springs vs Rosemead

  • The population in Rosemead is higher at 49,791, compared to 4,700 in Crystal springs.
  • Residents in Crystal springs have a higher median age of 45.3 years compared to 43.1 years in Rosemead.
  • Rosemead has a higher median income of $70,073, compared to $44,653 in Crystal springs.
  • In Rosemead, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 28.0% in Crystal springs.
  • The poverty level is higher in Rosemead at 14%, compared to 12% in Crystal springs.
  • Rosemead has a higher unemployment rate at 5.6% compared to 3.5% in Crystal springs.

Demographics

Demographics Crystal springs vs Rosemead provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Crystal springs Rosemead
Black 66 1
White 24 -4
Asian Data is updating 65
Hispanic 6 32
Two or More Races 4 5
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Crystal springs vs Rosemead

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Crystal springs at 66% compared to 1% in Rosemead.
  • Crystal springs has a higher percentage of White residents at 24% compared to -4% in Rosemead.
  • In Rosemead, the Asian population stands at 65%, greater than 0% in Crystal springs.
  • Rosemead has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 32%, compared to 6% in Crystal springs.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Rosemead at 5%, compared to 4% in Crystal springs.
  • In Rosemead, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Crystal springs.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Crystal springs Rosemead
Mental Health Not Good 18.5% 14.2%
Physical Health Not Good 14.9% 11.1%
Depression 21.5% 12.2%
Smoking 24.2% 12.3%
Binge Drinking 12.2% 11.0%
Obesity 45.8% 21.6%
Disability Percentage 18.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Crystal springs vs Rosemead

  • More residents in Crystal springs report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 14.2% in Rosemead.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Crystal springs at 21.5% compared to 12.2% in Rosemead.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Crystal springs at 24.2% compared to 12.3% in Rosemead.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Crystal springs at 12.2% compared to 11.0% in Rosemead.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Crystal springs at 45.8% compared to 21.6% in Rosemead.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Crystal springs at 18.0% compared to 9.0% in Rosemead.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Crystal springs Rosemead
No Schooling 2.0% (94) 10.4% (5,181)
High School Diploma 12.1% (568) 17.8% (8,852)
Less than High School 20.1% (945) 31.2% (15,559)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.5% (915) 16.5% (8,228)

Education Levels Comparison: Crystal springs vs Rosemead

  • In Rosemead, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 10.4% compared to 2.0% in Crystal springs.
  • In Rosemead, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.8% compared to 12.1% in Crystal springs.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Rosemead at 31.2%, compared to 20.1% in Crystal springs.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Crystal springs hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.5% compared to 16.5% in Rosemead.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.