Demographics details for Crystal springs, MS vs Roanoke, VA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Crystal springs, MS vs Roanoke, VA.

Data Crystal springs Roanoke
Population 4,700 97,847
Median Age 45.3 years 38.1 years
Median Income $44,653 $51,523
Married Families 28.0% 28.0%
Poverty Level 12% 15%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.3

Population Comparison: Crystal springs vs Roanoke

  • The population in Roanoke is higher at 97,847, compared to 4,700 in Crystal springs.
  • Residents in Crystal springs have a higher median age of 45.3 years compared to 38.1 years in Roanoke.
  • Roanoke has a higher median income of $51,523, compared to $44,653 in Crystal springs.
  • The percentage of married families is the same in both Crystal springs and Roanoke at 28.0%.
  • The poverty level is higher in Roanoke at 15%, compared to 12% in Crystal springs.
  • The unemployment rate in Crystal springs is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.3% in Roanoke.

Demographics

Demographics Crystal springs vs Roanoke provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Crystal springs Roanoke
Black 66 30
White 24 53
Asian Data is updating 3
Hispanic 6 7
Two or More Races 4 7
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Crystal springs vs Roanoke

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Crystal springs at 66% compared to 30% in Roanoke.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Roanoke at 53% compared to 24% in Crystal springs.
  • In Roanoke, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Crystal springs.
  • Roanoke has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 6% in Crystal springs.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Roanoke at 7%, compared to 4% in Crystal springs.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Crystal springs and Roanoke at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Crystal springs Roanoke
Mental Health Not Good 18.5% 19.1%
Physical Health Not Good 14.9% 13.1%
Depression 21.5% 25.3%
Smoking 24.2% 21.4%
Binge Drinking 12.2% 16.4%
Obesity 45.8% 41.2%
Disability Percentage 18.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Crystal springs vs Roanoke

  • In Roanoke, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 18.5% in Crystal springs.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Roanoke at 25.3% versus 21.5% in Crystal springs.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Crystal springs at 24.2% compared to 21.4% in Roanoke.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Roanoke at 16.4% compared to 12.2% in Crystal springs.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Crystal springs at 45.8% compared to 41.2% in Roanoke.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Crystal springs at 18.0% compared to 12.0% in Roanoke.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Crystal springs Roanoke
No Schooling 2.0% (94) 1.0% (959)
High School Diploma 12.1% (568) 19.7% (19,319)
Less than High School 20.1% (945) 12.3% (11,988)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.5% (915) 20.2% (19,786)

Education Levels Comparison: Crystal springs vs Roanoke

  • A higher percentage of residents in Crystal springs have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 1.0% in Roanoke.
  • In Roanoke, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.7% compared to 12.1% in Crystal springs.
  • More residents in Crystal springs have less than a high school education at 20.1% compared to 12.3% in Roanoke.
  • In Roanoke, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.2% compared to 19.5% in Crystal springs.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.