Demographics details for Crystal lake, IL vs Spanish fork, UT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Crystal lake, IL vs Spanish fork, UT.

Data Crystal lake Spanish fork
Population 40,661 44,102
Median Age 39.9 years 27.4 years
Median Income $103,018 $93,989
Married Families 46.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level 5% 6%
Unemployment Rate 5.4 3.8

Population Comparison: Crystal lake vs Spanish fork

  • The population in Spanish fork is higher at 44,102, compared to 40,661 in Crystal lake.
  • Residents in Crystal lake have a higher median age of 39.9 years compared to 27.4 years in Spanish fork.
  • Crystal lake has a higher median income of $103,018 compared to $93,989 in Spanish fork.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Crystal lake at 46.0% compared to 43.0% in Spanish fork.
  • The poverty level is higher in Spanish fork at 6%, compared to 5% in Crystal lake.
  • The unemployment rate in Crystal lake is higher at 5.4%, compared to 3.8% in Spanish fork.

Demographics

Demographics Crystal lake vs Spanish fork provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Crystal lake Spanish fork
Black 1 1
White 79 80
Asian 4 Data is updating
Hispanic 11 12
Two or More Races 5 7
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Crystal lake vs Spanish fork

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Crystal lake and Spanish fork at 1%.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Spanish fork at 80% compared to 79% in Crystal lake.
  • The Asian population is larger in Crystal lake at 4% compared to 0% in Spanish fork.
  • Spanish fork has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 11% in Crystal lake.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Spanish fork at 7%, compared to 5% in Crystal lake.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Crystal lake and Spanish fork at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Crystal lake Spanish fork
Mental Health Not Good 14.0% 15.0%
Physical Health Not Good 8.9% 10.8%
Depression 19.6% 23.8%
Smoking 12.3% 7.7%
Binge Drinking 18.9% 8.3%
Obesity 29.5% 31.0%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 8.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Crystal lake vs Spanish fork

  • In Spanish fork, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.0% compared to 14.0% in Crystal lake.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Spanish fork at 23.8% versus 19.6% in Crystal lake.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Crystal lake at 12.3% compared to 7.7% in Spanish fork.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Crystal lake at 18.9% compared to 8.3% in Spanish fork.
  • Spanish fork has higher obesity rates at 31.0% compared to 29.5% in Crystal lake.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Crystal lake at 9.0% compared to 8.0% in Spanish fork.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Crystal lake Spanish fork
No Schooling 0.2% (95) 0.4% (175)
High School Diploma 13.8% (5,614) 9.1% (4,010)
Less than High School 5.8% (2,362) 5.9% (2,583)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 27.1% (11,028) 19.4% (8,546)

Education Levels Comparison: Crystal lake vs Spanish fork

  • In Spanish fork, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.2% in Crystal lake.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Crystal lake hold a high school diploma at 13.8% compared to 9.1% in Spanish fork.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Spanish fork at 5.9%, compared to 5.8% in Crystal lake.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Crystal lake hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.1% compared to 19.4% in Spanish fork.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.