Demographics details for Croswell, MI vs Meadville, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Croswell, MI vs Meadville, PA.
| Data | Croswell | Meadville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,317 | 12,680 |
| Median Age | 41.3 years | 35.7 years |
| Median Income | $55,732 | $46,157 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Croswell vs Meadville
- The population in Meadville is higher at 12,680, compared to 2,317 in Croswell.
- Residents in Croswell have a higher median age of 41.3 years compared to 35.7 years in Meadville.
- Croswell has a higher median income of $55,732 compared to $46,157 in Meadville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Croswell at 45.0% compared to 27.0% in Meadville.
- The poverty level is higher in Meadville at 12%, compared to 9% in Croswell.
- Meadville has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.2% in Croswell.
Demographics
Demographics Croswell vs Meadville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Croswell | Meadville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 5 |
| White | 78 | 86 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 16 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Croswell vs Meadville
- In Meadville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 0% in Croswell.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Meadville at 86% compared to 78% in Croswell.
- In Meadville, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Croswell.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Croswell at 16% compared to 2% in Meadville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Meadville at 6%, compared to 5% in Croswell.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Croswell at 1% compared to 0% in Meadville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Croswell | Meadville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.4% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 14.0% |
| Depression | 25.0% | 26.6% |
| Smoking | 19.1% | 24.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.0% | 16.6% |
| Obesity | 34.4% | 41.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Croswell vs Meadville
- In Meadville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 17.4% in Croswell.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Meadville at 26.6% versus 25.0% in Croswell.
- Meadville has a higher smoking rate at 24.2% compared to 19.1% in Croswell.
- Binge drinking is more common in Croswell at 18.0% compared to 16.6% in Meadville.
- Meadville has higher obesity rates at 41.5% compared to 34.4% in Croswell.
- Disability percentages are higher in Croswell at 22.0% compared to 21.0% in Meadville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Croswell | Meadville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (13) | 0.2% (29) |
| High School Diploma | 27.1% (628) | 24.5% (3,110) |
| Less than High School | 17.9% (415) | 8.6% (1,085) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.7% (201) | 15.4% (1,953) |
Education Levels Comparison: Croswell vs Meadville
- A higher percentage of residents in Croswell have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.2% in Meadville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Croswell hold a high school diploma at 27.1% compared to 24.5% in Meadville.
- More residents in Croswell have less than a high school education at 17.9% compared to 8.6% in Meadville.
- In Meadville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.4% compared to 8.7% in Croswell.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.