Demographics details for Crossett, AR vs Overland park, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Crossett, AR vs Overland park, KS.
Data | Crossett | Overland park |
---|---|---|
Population | 4,613 | 197,726 |
Median Age | 43.6 years | 38.4 years |
Median Income | $41,250 | $100,876 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 19% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Crossett vs Overland park
- The population in Overland park is higher at 197,726, compared to 4,613 in Crossett.
- Residents in Crossett have a higher median age of 43.6 years compared to 38.4 years in Overland park.
- Overland park has a higher median income of $100,876, compared to $41,250 in Crossett.
- In Overland park, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 40.0% in Crossett.
- Crossett has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 6% in Overland park.
- The unemployment rate in Crossett is higher at 5.1%, compared to 3.3% in Overland park.
Demographics
Demographics Crossett vs Overland park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Crossett | Overland park |
---|---|---|
Black | 45 | 5 |
White | 51 | 74 |
Asian | Data is updating | 9 |
Hispanic | 2 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Crossett vs Overland park
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Crossett at 45% compared to 5% in Overland park.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Overland park at 74% compared to 51% in Crossett.
- In Overland park, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 0% in Crossett.
- Overland park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 2% in Crossett.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Overland park at 5%, compared to 2% in Crossett.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Crossett and Overland park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Crossett | Overland park |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 21.0% | 12.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.1% | 6.9% |
Depression | 26.2% | 18.3% |
Smoking | 25.8% | 9.6% |
Binge Drinking | 12.6% | 19.7% |
Obesity | 44.0% | 28.6% |
Disability Percentage | 27.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Crossett vs Overland park
- More residents in Crossett report poor mental health at 21.0% compared to 12.2% in Overland park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Crossett at 26.2% compared to 18.3% in Overland park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Crossett at 25.8% compared to 9.6% in Overland park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Overland park at 19.7% compared to 12.6% in Crossett.
- Obesity rates are higher in Crossett at 44.0% compared to 28.6% in Overland park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Crossett at 27.0% compared to 8.0% in Overland park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Crossett | Overland park |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (40) | 0.5% (897) |
High School Diploma | 25.8% (1,191) | 7.1% (13,953) |
Less than High School | 14.2% (653) | 3.3% (6,590) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.9% (687) | 43.1% (85,152) |
Education Levels Comparison: Crossett vs Overland park
- A higher percentage of residents in Crossett have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.5% in Overland park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Crossett hold a high school diploma at 25.8% compared to 7.1% in Overland park.
- More residents in Crossett have less than a high school education at 14.2% compared to 3.3% in Overland park.
- In Overland park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 43.1% compared to 14.9% in Crossett.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.