Demographics details for Crossett, AR vs Mc clure, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Crossett, AR vs Mc clure, OH.
| Data | Crossett | Mc clure |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,613 | 693 |
| Median Age | 43.6 years | 30.5 years |
| Median Income | $41,250 | $55,938 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 19% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Crossett vs Mc clure
- In Crossett, the population is higher at 4,613, compared to 693 in Mc clure.
- Residents in Crossett have a higher median age of 43.6 years compared to 30.5 years in Mc clure.
- Mc clure has a higher median income of $55,938, compared to $41,250 in Crossett.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Crossett at 40.0% compared to 37.0% in Mc clure.
- Crossett has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 12% in Mc clure.
- The unemployment rate in Crossett is higher at 5.1%, compared to 4.0% in Mc clure.
Demographics
Demographics Crossett vs Mc clure provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Crossett | Mc clure |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 45 | Data is updating |
| White | 51 | 65 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 16 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 15 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Crossett vs Mc clure
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Crossett at 45% compared to 0% in Mc clure.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mc clure at 65% compared to 51% in Crossett.
- In Mc clure, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Crossett.
- Mc clure has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 2% in Crossett.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mc clure at 15%, compared to 2% in Crossett.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Crossett and Mc clure at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Crossett | Mc clure |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.0% | 16.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.1% | 10.5% |
| Depression | 26.2% | 22.4% |
| Smoking | 25.8% | 18.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.6% | 19.9% |
| Obesity | 44.0% | 40.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 27.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Crossett vs Mc clure
- More residents in Crossett report poor mental health at 21.0% compared to 16.4% in Mc clure.
- Depression is more prevalent in Crossett at 26.2% compared to 22.4% in Mc clure.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Crossett at 25.8% compared to 18.2% in Mc clure.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Mc clure at 19.9% compared to 12.6% in Crossett.
- Obesity rates are higher in Crossett at 44.0% compared to 40.2% in Mc clure.
- Disability percentages are higher in Crossett at 27.0% compared to 22.0% in Mc clure.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Crossett | Mc clure |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (40) | 0.3% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 25.8% (1,191) | 28.6% (198) |
| Less than High School | 14.2% (653) | 17.7% (123) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.9% (687) | 5.5% (38) |
Education Levels Comparison: Crossett vs Mc clure
- A higher percentage of residents in Crossett have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.3% in Mc clure.
- In Mc clure, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.6% compared to 25.8% in Crossett.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mc clure at 17.7%, compared to 14.2% in Crossett.
- A higher percentage of residents in Crossett hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.9% compared to 5.5% in Mc clure.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.