Demographics details for Crossett, AR vs Keizer, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Crossett, AR vs Keizer, OR.
| Data | Crossett | Keizer |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,613 | 38,704 |
| Median Age | 43.6 years | 35.8 years |
| Median Income | $41,250 | $75,753 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 19% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Crossett vs Keizer
- The population in Keizer is higher at 38,704, compared to 4,613 in Crossett.
- Residents in Crossett have a higher median age of 43.6 years compared to 35.8 years in Keizer.
- Keizer has a higher median income of $75,753, compared to $41,250 in Crossett.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Crossett at 40.0% compared to 38.0% in Keizer.
- Crossett has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 10% in Keizer.
- The unemployment rate in Crossett is higher at 5.1%, compared to 3.6% in Keizer.
Demographics
Demographics Crossett vs Keizer provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Crossett | Keizer |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 45 | 1 |
| White | 51 | 58 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 25 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 14 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Crossett vs Keizer
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Crossett at 45% compared to 1% in Keizer.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Keizer at 58% compared to 51% in Crossett.
- In Keizer, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Crossett.
- Keizer has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 25%, compared to 2% in Crossett.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Keizer at 14%, compared to 2% in Crossett.
- In Keizer, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Crossett.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Crossett | Keizer |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.0% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.1% | 11.4% |
| Depression | 26.2% | 28.5% |
| Smoking | 25.8% | 15.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.6% | 16.5% |
| Obesity | 44.0% | 35.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 27.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Crossett vs Keizer
- More residents in Crossett report poor mental health at 21.0% compared to 17.9% in Keizer.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Keizer at 28.5% versus 26.2% in Crossett.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Crossett at 25.8% compared to 15.4% in Keizer.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Keizer at 16.5% compared to 12.6% in Crossett.
- Obesity rates are higher in Crossett at 44.0% compared to 35.7% in Keizer.
- Disability percentages are higher in Crossett at 27.0% compared to 16.0% in Keizer.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Crossett | Keizer |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (40) | 1.8% (685) |
| High School Diploma | 25.8% (1,191) | 12.7% (4,898) |
| Less than High School | 14.2% (653) | 13.9% (5,363) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.9% (687) | 17.1% (6,617) |
Education Levels Comparison: Crossett vs Keizer
- In Keizer, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.9% in Crossett.
- A higher percentage of residents in Crossett hold a high school diploma at 25.8% compared to 12.7% in Keizer.
- More residents in Crossett have less than a high school education at 14.2% compared to 13.9% in Keizer.
- In Keizer, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.1% compared to 14.9% in Crossett.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.